Apart from typical anti-vax tinfoil hat websites, who like to ping these kinds of stories off each other without actually checking any facts, the only news I can find for this drug is that a couple of batches have been pulled over concerns about contamination. Which is obviously not ideal, but is no reflection on the drug itself.
There is this story which has the headline you report about a "leaked report" (linked here) from GSK.
I have read the GSK report, which says that they estimate between 18 232 834 and 72 931 338 infants have been vaccinated with this drug between October 2009 and October 2011. Of these number of infants, the report says that there was a fatal outcome for thirteen.
So I fail to see where this doctor got his numbers.
The news article goes on to say that the Indian court upheld the doctor's conclusions that the deaths of the additional infants by apparent SIDS after receiving the vaccination seem unlikely to be purely due to chance.
But the thing about chance it, occasionally, that 1/1,000,000 event does happen. And sometimes there are random peaks in cases of any disease or cases of SIDS.
The basic conclusion is that the reason this story isn't news is that statistics are so tentative that you have to twist the numbers and squint at them to see anything out of the normal range for any vaccine. And millions of babies have been saved from life-threatening diseases for having received the vaccine.
Did you actually bother to look at any of this yourself or did you just read an sensationalised article on your favourite anti-vax site and then pop over here to spread the hysteria?