However, as those in the know do not expect Labour to win outright but at best, slip in via the backdoor with a coalition partner.
Could you kindly provide some links to 'those in the know', please? Because in the interest of openness and transparency in the democratic process, those need to be shared.
Should those links not be forthcoming, I'm going to go with the polls, which aren't narrowing just yet and point to - well, the opposite of a coalition.
However, even if we do end up with a coalition, this would be a completely legitimate outcome of the electoral process - simply put, a matter of the electorate not wanting to give any one party a mandate to govern. This is common in countries with proportional representation and even in the UK is something that could happen, as shown in 2010. A coalition would therefore not be 'slipping in via the backdoor' but would instead be fully legitimate. To hint that it would be in any way shady is to show a fundamental disrespect for British democracy. Are you opposed to democracy?
With the verbal beating received by the socialist labour leader the other night from Sunak - I wonder what will happen if he was really to become a joint PM with his coalition partenr/s
Please refer back to the para above for the truth about coalitions in a democracy. It's also worthwhile to look at the articles below, which show that Keir Starmer in no way received 'a verbal beating' - in fact, one poll shows him coming out the winner. In an era where there is so much misinformation, it's really important not to add to the lies and obfuscation from politicians by posting things which are inaccurate and misleading - I hope we can all agree on that.
https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/49618-general-election-2024-itv-debate-snap-poll
https://news.sky.com/story/election-latest-news-uk-sunak-starmer-tories-labour-live-12593360?postid=7773446