Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

General election 2024

Mandatory National Service for 18 yr olds Sunak decrees

237 replies

Heavenssakes · 25/05/2024 22:20

How do you feel about mandatory National Service for 18 year olds - Sunak says he will introduce it if he wins election.

This is so not what I want for my DC, nor something they want to do. 1 years military service, when they have worked hard towards getting into Uni, and developing a career?

It's like steppng back into the 1950s.

Only saving grace, I can't imagine the forces wanting or being able to deal with thousands of press-ganged kids.

I fear for Sunak's sanity.

https://news.sky.com/story/sunak-says-he-will-bring-back-national-service-if-tories-win-general-election-13143184

Sunak says he will bring back National Service if Tories win general election

The prime minister unveils a plan that would see 18-year-olds given the choice of a full-time military placement for 12 months or a scheme to volunteer for one weekend a month for a year.

https://news.sky.com/story/sunak-says-he-will-bring-back-national-service-if-tories-win-general-election-13143184

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
qwertyqwertyqwertyqwerty · 26/05/2024 13:13

SummerFeverVenice · 26/05/2024 13:10

“possible non-criminal sanctions for any teenagers”

I think that would be in context of first steps before criminal prosecution.

noncriminal sanctions are fines or community orders where you don’t end up with a criminal record. If you fail to comply, then you can be charged with a criminal offence.

So, a possible route would be refusing teenagers will be fined, if they don’t or can’t pay the fine then they will be subject to community order to do the National service, if they refuse again, only then would they be handed a criminal custodial sentence.

So the rich can buy their way out.

Cleverly said There’s going to be no criminal sanction.

What you're describing ultimately has a criminal sanction.

qwertyqwertyqwertyqwerty · 26/05/2024 13:15

WinterMorn · 26/05/2024 13:12

I don’t know, I am not privy to the policy! I was just thinking out loud about the disposals we currently have in place.

The things they said yesterday (mandatory) don't align with what they've said today (no criminal sanction).

WinterMorn · 26/05/2024 13:16

qwertyqwertyqwertyqwerty · 26/05/2024 13:15

The things they said yesterday (mandatory) don't align with what they've said today (no criminal sanction).

Yes, there does need to be some ironing out and consistency in comms.

qwertyqwertyqwertyqwerty · 26/05/2024 13:17

WinterMorn · 26/05/2024 13:16

Yes, there does need to be some ironing out and consistency in comms.

Because it's not a real policy. Just a gimmick.

schloss · 26/05/2024 13:17

I personally think some kind of mandatory volunteering for 18 year olds is not a bad idea, that can include armed services if they choose it. Weekend charitable volunteering can help young people develop people skills, empathy, a work ethic etc.

Not doing it should not result in any punishment financial or otherwise though.

Like any of these announcements, irrepective of which party it comes from, the MSM will only pull out the juicy bits for the headlines, the details are the important information. But in theory I think it could be useful.

WinterMorn · 26/05/2024 13:19

qwertyqwertyqwertyqwerty · 26/05/2024 13:17

Because it's not a real policy. Just a gimmick.

Well, let’s see what happens.

SummerFeverVenice · 26/05/2024 13:25

qwertyqwertyqwertyqwerty · 26/05/2024 13:13

Cleverly said There’s going to be no criminal sanction.

What you're describing ultimately has a criminal sanction.

Almost every noncriminal sanction leads to a criminal one if you refuse the noncriminal one. If you don’t have this, then it’s not mandatory. The only one I can think of that would not would be making student finance only for those who do the National service. And that would make it not mandatory, but apply economic duress to bright, poor young people.

My trust in what the Tories have said is that the mandatory part is true, and the no criminal sanction is not entirely true. As politicians, they are not held to same standards of truth as journalists and advertisers.

Hedonism · 26/05/2024 13:30

WinterMorn · 26/05/2024 11:48

@Springchickenonion there are numerous other non-custodial options.

Yep, like a fixed number of hours of community service. Oh, hang on....

This whole thing is ridiculous.

howshouldibehave · 26/05/2024 13:34

If exclusions were applied it would in the context of refusing a business licence or making you ineligible student finance for Uni.

Brilliant, so rich families who don’t need student finance and can pay their kids’ fees directly for them can just not worry and let them avoid National Service that way.

An excellent use of ‘levelling up’ funding…

SummerFeverVenice · 26/05/2024 13:36

howshouldibehave · 26/05/2024 13:34

If exclusions were applied it would in the context of refusing a business licence or making you ineligible student finance for Uni.

Brilliant, so rich families who don’t need student finance and can pay their kids’ fees directly for them can just not worry and let them avoid National Service that way.

An excellent use of ‘levelling up’ funding…

Governments have always forced or coerced the working class to be their cannon fodder. I have a feeling this is more of the same.

WinterMorn · 26/05/2024 13:39

howshouldibehave · 26/05/2024 13:34

If exclusions were applied it would in the context of refusing a business licence or making you ineligible student finance for Uni.

Brilliant, so rich families who don’t need student finance and can pay their kids’ fees directly for them can just not worry and let them avoid National Service that way.

An excellent use of ‘levelling up’ funding…

And in breaking news……rich people have a more comfortable life and more opportunity than the rest of us. Shocker.

MrsSkylerWhite · 26/05/2024 13:41

SummerFeverVenice
**
Governments have always forced or coerced the working class to be their cannon fodder. I have a feeling this is more of the same.

To be fair to the other classes, many of their young officers were slaughtered leading their men during WW1.

Piggywaspushed · 26/05/2024 13:41

Yes, but the money is coming from levelling up funds. There's a certain irony...

SummerFeverVenice · 26/05/2024 13:45

MrsSkylerWhite · 26/05/2024 13:41

SummerFeverVenice
**
Governments have always forced or coerced the working class to be their cannon fodder. I have a feeling this is more of the same.

To be fair to the other classes, many of their young officers were slaughtered leading their men during WW1.

Not as many…disproportionally lower

Jux · 26/05/2024 13:48

I think those who have truly benfited from what society has given them should be the focus here. They're the ones who should be conscripted/made to volunteer one w/e a month.

So many 18 year olds have had such short shrift from society, why should they do anything more for it. They are lost, uneducated, hardly sheltered, no future.

Newgirls · 26/05/2024 13:49

Like Mrs sunak would let her kids do it?!

nuts

at least it might galvanise more 18 year olds to vote this year

Carly944 · 26/05/2024 13:51

Why didn't he wait until after the election to implement it. Couldn't he wait to see if he won, and then when he won, announce it.

As someone just said to me here, "it's not exactly an election vote winner is it"

Carly944 · 26/05/2024 13:52

Newgirls · 26/05/2024 13:49

Like Mrs sunak would let her kids do it?!

nuts

at least it might galvanise more 18 year olds to vote this year

He said he does want his kids to do it

Jegersur · 26/05/2024 13:53

We already have National Citizens Service. My DD did it while at school.
Otherwise, it’s just ridiculous. What about all the 18-year-olds who are working? Are young soldiers going to have to do volunteer work as well?

howshouldibehave · 26/05/2024 13:54

Newgirls · 26/05/2024 13:49

Like Mrs sunak would let her kids do it?!

nuts

at least it might galvanise more 18 year olds to vote this year

I’m sure she would let them do a bit of (carefully chosen) voluntary work as long as it was nowhere too grubby. It’s not like they would be putting their Saturday job wages on the line!

Volunteering work is much easier to squeeze in when you haven’t already got to go to paid work to make ends meet.

SilverGlitterBaubles · 26/05/2024 13:57

I suspect that this is a tactical squirrel news story, just put anything out there that dominates the Sunday newspapers and tv news rather than pictures of Rishi looking like a drowned rat. As long as the attention is not on Labour then they are happy. Next week will be something about inheritance tax or another half baked headline grabber.

Newgirls · 26/05/2024 14:01

Yes perhaps a carefully chosen photo op role before they fly off to Harvard or something

kids can do d of e if it’s about volunteering

agree that it’s about grabbing headlines over the next few weeks - desperate

TeamPolin · 26/05/2024 14:12

The Tories don't have the cash to fund the NHS properly but apparently they have the cash to pay loads of unskilled teenagers to do national service in the NHS??

Delawear · 26/05/2024 15:42

Spacecowboys · 26/05/2024 09:51

No, don’t agree with it. Some 18 year olds have a plan and are ambitious and hard working. How is it beneficial to these teens ( or anyone else) to delay them going to university for a year when they already know they want to study medicine, nursing, engineering etc etc. Even ‘choosing’ the monthly voluntary work would impact them because it limits their ability to do part time work around their studies. It is potentially beneficial for those 18 year olds who have no idea what they want to do and lack direction. But it should be a choice/ option that they can consider, not something that is forced on them.

That’s a good point actually - teens who are from wealthier homes will be able to afford to continue to study and do the volunteering, whereas students who need to work weekends to afford to study will not.

Delawear · 26/05/2024 15:43

TeamPolin · 26/05/2024 14:12

The Tories don't have the cash to fund the NHS properly but apparently they have the cash to pay loads of unskilled teenagers to do national service in the NHS??

Bollocks isn’t it?

It’s a distraction from the trail of destruction that the tories have left in our basic services.