Thanks all. I entirely understand the sense in reading up on a topic before it’s covered in class and maybe making basic notes, but I can’t get past is ,well, the teacher not ‘teaching’ the material. Surely a good teacher is doing much more than parroting what is in the textbook, explaining and emphasising points, making links with previous topics etc.
I think only one of DS’s Chemistry teachers is doing what Cherryburn says should happen in the lesson - tasks and questions to check and consolidate learning. The other just repeats the topic that DS has already made notes on. DS spoke to him yesterday- and got told he could use the lesson to start making notes for the next topic. But DS can’t see the point if the teacher will just repeat that info in the next lesson.
The flipped learning is new this year and just in Chemistry for DS. There was an (anonymous) survey recently for comments from students but no feedback on that. We have parents’ evening this week and will raise it then - our appointment (most subjects you get told which of the 2 teachers to see) is with the better teacher.
Overall DS is finding that he’s spending more time on Chemistry than any of his others subjects - but he doesn’t feel that he’s consolidating and extending his knowledge despite the hours put in.
FirstofHN you did mean your DS officially does flipped learning didn’t you? Interested in your DS’s perspective as he is also on the spectrum. But I think I’m realising that DS’s problem isn’t with the flipped learning per se, but the teacher’s delivery of it.