OP, I'm quite distressed at some of the responses you have received on this thread.
Why are people treating the possibility of coercive physical conduct as almost morally irrelevant because the people doing it were healthcare professionals?
If a healthcare professional deliberately uses physical force to make a woman do something with her body that she is explicitly refusing, outside an immediate emergency, calling that "just what healthcare professionals have to do" is itself part of the problem. Medical indication is not consent.
The threats of dead babies and having healthcare withheld if you aren't a good little girl who does what the midwives and doctors tell you, is exactly the kind of culture that allows the maternity scandals to occur. I'm most distressed by the idea that some of the posters behind these posts are health professionals themselves. If you are, shame on you, sit up and take notice. It might actually protect you to stop being so defensive for 5 minutes.
There is a challenging reality here where the law in England does consider sexual assault to have occurred if touching of the genitals occurs after coercion, and public understanding of this has grown. The various medical and midwifery bodies have failed to engage with this reality head on in a way that protects both professionals and patients, and that should be the bloody scandal.
OP, again, I have also experienced sexual assaults that were much less distressing and traumatic than being coerced into being on my back and having vaginal exams while in labour, But postnatal check-ups never involved asking me whether or not I got flashbacks I got afterwards, so no harm was done right?