Mumsnet Logo
My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Feminism: chat

Had never considered this aspect of the sex work is work movement

98 replies

miri1985 · 20/02/2022 20:38

Was reading this excellent article by Mia Döring about her memoir and I had never realised that we only ever hear from prostituted women that sex work is work, its only ever them who put their names and faces to that idea. If its just a service thats being purchased why do men never come forward and say I'm a punter, I'm just buying a service, I'm going to let everyone know its a choice I make.
She writes really well in this article and I'm going to be very interested to read her book

www.independent.ie/life/health-wellbeing/mia-doring-on-the-irish-sex-trade-seeing-you-is-a-hobby-they-feel-entitled-to-indulge-41360309.html

Why are we not talking about these men? Why are they not talking? In the debates about prostitution, we do not hear from them. They don’t ‘come out’. They don’t create associations or campaign for ‘punters’ rights’. If punting is the legitimate and harmless hobby they claim it to be, why not?
There is a lot of money to be made from operating brothels and running an escort website. Advertising is very expensive – one ‘online directory’ of women in prostitution had a turnover of €6m in 2015. The men pay around a €100 for 30 minutes of sex with a woman, around €200 for an hour. And with more than 100,000 punters, there is obviously no shortage of male demand for women’s bodies.

We know that most women in the sex trade are not there voluntarily, and when we understand sexual consent to be freely given, voluntary and reversible, it is inarguable that when people defend the sex trade in Ireland, they are defending the daily rape of women and girls. The pimps who run the websites become multi-millionaires by serving up a literal rape market.



She also did an excellent interview with Roisin Ingle about her book

www.irishtimes.com/culture/books/irish-men-are-raping-women-for-money-all-across-the-country-1.4797680

"Her argument is that paying for sex does not legitimise the act or make it consensual. “You can’t pay someone to be your friend,” she says. “You don’t have a ‘rent a friend’ scheme, because it’s never going to be mutual. Our expectations are on the floor when it comes to men’s behaviour, especially sexually. We say, ‘Ah, that’s just men, they pay for sex.’ But prostitution sex is not sex, because sex cannot be paid for. And sex is not work.”

She knows there are people, sex workers and their advocates, who argue strongly that it is indeed work, but she has a very different view. “They can call themselves sex workers if they want. I don’t care. I care about the vast majority of women in the sex trade, and that’s all I care about. The vast majority of them are coerced or there by trafficking or there out of desperation, poverty, abuse and addiction.”

She says in the book that as long as we’re all distracted, arguing over whether prostitution is ‘work’, we’re not thinking of the choices of the men running the sex trade for profit. As the debate rages, “these men can sit back and laugh, knowing they have nothing to fear.”

Some sex-worker advocates, she maintains, describe men who want to “connect”, who are in need of touching. The lonely or the elderly, the socially isolated. But, she says, in the four years she spent ‘servicing’ random men, she never met anyone who just needed to talk or needed a hug. These are the men she met: “In their 40s and 50s, middle class, self-assured and entitled.”

“Even if 100 per cent of punters were wheelchair-ridden, chronically lonely, altruistic philanthropists, they have no right to use a woman’s body to have an orgasm. Nothing gives anyone that right. To achieve orgasm is not a right. Sex is neither a bodily need nor a right.”

OP posts:
Report

vivariumvivariumsvivaria · 20/02/2022 20:43

Wow, yes, that's well written and she makes an interesting point.

Men don't die from lack of sex. They just pretend as if they might. Which is self indulgent and manipulative.

They don't see women as human. It's grotesque.

Report

IamSarah · 20/02/2022 21:15

Thank you for sharing OP. The article is very well written and I'm interested in reading the book too. I imagine it will be a tough read.

It's a very good point that it's never the men who use prostitutes that proudly claim 'sex work is work'.

Report

rubytubeytubes · 20/02/2022 21:18

Thanks for sharing I definitely want to read the book

Report

Linguini · 20/02/2022 22:20

Yes it's true, if sex work is work it implies women who have sex are "working".
It's very derogatory.

Women paid for sex don't fancy you. Women who fancy you are not working to please you...

Report

LivMumsnet · 20/02/2022 22:28

Evening - we're moving this over to Feminism Chat now.

Thanks all.

Report

Joolsin · 20/02/2022 22:35

I thought the bit where she was in the man's house and she misunderstood when he asked 'what do you do?' was heartbreaking. There is no justification for prostitution, so smoothing it over by calling it sex work, by invoking the 'happy hooker' myth, is just bullshit.

Report

Linguini · 20/02/2022 22:35

I think MNHQ are trying to bump the "chat" zone maybe? Grin Not disrespectin or disagreeing by the way....

Report

EmbarrassingHadrosaurus · 20/02/2022 23:02

Superb piece.

I grew up in an area with a lot of brothels and sex workers. I've never understood the empowerment argument. I do know that it was an area of everyday violence and ambient danger where men felt entitled to purchase sexual services even from children for a bar of Galaxy.

I don't know, but when men banged on our windows and doors because they'd mistaken our house for the one they wanted, I never felt they were doing it as a prequel to seeking a hug, some chat, and simple human contact.

Report

cheeseismydownfall · 20/02/2022 23:24

That's a great piece, thank you for sharing it.

It makes me think of our village WhatsApp group, which is always awash with people asking for recommendations for reliable decorators, plumbers, builders etc.

Funnily enough if never seen anyone asking for a recommendation for a really prostitute. I wonder why?

Report

jennywhitehorses · 21/02/2022 14:29

The vast majority of them are coerced or there by trafficking or there out of desperation, poverty, abuse and addiction.

This is false. Academics such as Professor Nick Mai and Professor Belinda Brooks-Gordon know all about prostitution and know that it is not true.
www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2008/oct/16/law-jacquismith

Report

miri1985 · 21/02/2022 17:02

[quote jennywhitehorses]The vast majority of them are coerced or there by trafficking or there out of desperation, poverty, abuse and addiction.

This is false. Academics such as Professor Nick Mai and Professor Belinda Brooks-Gordon know all about prostitution and know that it is not true.
www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2008/oct/16/law-jacquismith[/quote]
That newspaper article only talks about trafficking, do you have data that says the other women aren't there because of desperation, poverty abuse and addiction?

OP posts:
Report

yellowtwo · 21/02/2022 17:03

What's not true jennywhitehorses
That article you posted doesn't talk about poverty, coercion abuse or addiction.

Report

yellowtwo · 21/02/2022 17:05

X-post miri1985

I'm looking forward to reading Mia Dörings book too.
This really stood out to me because it's something I've heard a lot from prostitution advocates.
Some sex-worker advocates, she maintains, describe men who want to “connect”, who are in need of touching. The lonely or the elderly, the socially isolated. But, she says, in the four years she spent ‘servicing’ random men, she never met anyone who just needed to talk or needed a hug. These are the men she met: “In their 40s and 50s, middle class, self-assured and entitled.”

Report

Waitwhat23 · 21/02/2022 17:06

Out of interest, which board did this thread start on?

Report

Joolsin · 21/02/2022 17:10

Also, @jennywhitehorses, Mia is writing about her experience of the sex trade in Ireland. You're quoting an article from the UK. It's well-known here in Ireland that trafficked women are brought here and fruquently moved on by their pimps from rural town to rural town

Report

CanIPleaseHaveOne · 21/02/2022 17:36

[quote jennywhitehorses]The vast majority of them are coerced or there by trafficking or there out of desperation, poverty, abuse and addiction.

This is false. Academics such as Professor Nick Mai and Professor Belinda Brooks-Gordon know all about prostitution and know that it is not true.
www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2008/oct/16/law-jacquismith[/quote]
So Academics and Professors know more about prostitution than a prostitute?

Sorry - "know all about prostitution". So I presume the prostitute only knows one aspect, and they know the rest?

Interesting!

Explain how?

Report

CanIPleaseHaveOne · 21/02/2022 17:37

@Waitwhat23

Out of interest, which board did this thread start on?

It came up on my "Active" box but was moved pretty quickly.

I had to go looking for it.

Why? It is very interesting.
Report

Mumoblue · 21/02/2022 17:42

I came across a bunch of quotes from “punters” that someone had pulled off a website that they use and the way they talk about women is sickening. Not surprising they don’t want to come forward and be vocal about it.

Report

daftcatlady · 21/02/2022 17:47

Hi @LivMumsnet why was this thread moved?

I think anyone who says sex work is work should read this book and have a think about if it’s the sort of work they would encourage their daughters to do.

Report

miri1985 · 21/02/2022 18:11

@Waitwhat23

Out of interest, which board did this thread start on?

I started it on the sex and gender board and it was moved to feminism chat
OP posts:
Report

Waitwhat23 · 21/02/2022 18:23

I thought so. I think MNHQ have started to realise that the vast majority of posters are using the Sex and Gender board as the FWR board, where a wide variety of issues are discussed both as stand-alone threads and within threads discussing other issues, (as was predicted at the time of the great schism) and the Feminism:Chat board is largely being ignored. They keep moving threads to this board but if they were actually doing this due to the topic being discussed, the vast majority of threads on Feminism:Chat should be moved to the Sex and Gender board.

I suspect they don't do this because it would leave the Feminism:Chat board with around 20 threads.

Report

Lranrwt · 21/02/2022 20:52

Men aren't going to support the 'work' theme because that would shatter the illusion that these women 'enjoy' their encounters with them.

Report

Lranrwt · 21/02/2022 20:58

I recently read some of the SAAFE forum posts (forum for sex workers). Assuming the posts are genuine, I was astonished at the number of posts describing the encounters in a positive way ( making reference to a man being a 'lovely' guy, an 'attractive' guy, good at oral sex, etc.). There was even a post lamenting the fact that the sex worker couldn't find a boyfriend as nice as some of her 'punters'.
I would have thought being a sex worker was a miserable, boring, soul-destroying job.

Report

balalake · 21/02/2022 21:05

I remember a documentary about a place in Sheffield where they did interview some of the men who go there. Not sure its representative though.

Report

CousinKrispy · 21/02/2022 22:03

This BBC radio piece has some interesting food for thought "Why men pay for sex" www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b04f9lmj

The men selected have a range of motivations. But I imagine men who would consent to be interviewed for a show like this may not be representative.

I swear I have heard men, especially of the libertarian dudebro type, arguing for "sex work is work" from the customer point of view, but I could be remembering incorrectly.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

Sign up to continue reading

Mumsnet's better when you're logged in. You can customise your experience and access way more features like messaging, watch and hide threads, voting and much more.

Already signed up?