Yup MaybeNotBob.
This morning I was reading through my usual diet of State media Propaganda, and I saw a story about Japan fortifying an island to make it an unsinkable aircraft carrier. Oh, I thought, I wanna do a quick fact check. Just out of armchair interest, because state propaganda interests me.
With VPN off, I BINGED it. Got the story I was reading, but I also saw the same headline on a US thinktank site, from 5 days ago. Clicked. That site was blocked.
So VPN on, got the western site, and lo and behold, it was a report issued as a press release by the same state media who were now reporting it as news.
So it was circular news. Source and final are the same, but it is filtered through international institutions to give it credibility. It's clever and crude at the same time.
It reminded me of @GlobeTrotter2000 using his pro Brexit site as a source.
Now, I am not saying the pro-Brexit site is disinformation. But it was defo biased. So the bias is transmitted, and possibly amplified.
It's a common trick. Instead of citing the base data, refer to the bias site, that puts a spin on the base data.
The thing is, for firm activists I think that is fair enough. It's not strictly dishonest. The problem is of course, is that same source is used by the other folk who might have different motives. And use the spun data dishonestly.
So for the people who have well thought out and logical reasons for Brexit, these sites are great for putting on bit of spin, and getting their message out.
However, it is a bit of a shame that they are keeping these well thought out and logical reasons to themselves.
Why won't they share them MayBeNotBob ?
Baffles me. Come on Globetrotter, spill the beans. Why are you all keeping these benefits secret from us all ?