@borntobequiet
How many people were sampled in the polls you have quoted? Was it everyone in the UK who is over 18, Approx 48 million, or was it a few thousand?
If it was the later, I would refer you to the polls from 2013 to 2016 which forecast a remain victory in the 2016 referendum. See the thread titled "one positive of Brexit" that was posted a few months ago for details.
A sample of a few thousand can never be extrapolated to reflect the view of 48 million. If they could, why bother with elections or referendums?
Remember the petition to revoke Article 50 signed by over 6 million. The Government response was:
The Department for Exiting the European Union responded to the petition on 26 March, stating that it would not revoke Article 50:
"We will honour the result of the 2016 referendum and work with Parliament to deliver a deal that ensures we leave the European Union. The government acknowledges the considerable number of people who have signed this petition. However, close to three-quarters of the electorate took part in the 2016 referendum, trusting that the result would be respected
Link is
Revoke Article 50 and remain in the EU petition - Wikipedia
So, if the Government ignores a petition of 6 million, what makes you think they will take any notice of a poll based on a few thousand?
@HannibalHeyes
Russia is not the only country to benefit from high oil prices caused by wars.
Leading oil and gas majors Shell, BP, ExxonMobil, Chevron, and TotalEnergies have collectively raked in $281bn in profits since Russia first invaded Ukraine two years ago, triggering a surge in fossil fuel prices as governments rushed to restrict Russian energy exports.
Link is:
Study: Top oil and gas majors rake in $281bn in profits since Russia invaded Ukraine | BusinessGreen News
The operators listed are: Dutch (EU member), French (EU member), UK and the US. So, they are gaining from the wars.