Topto again with the specious argument. First, the Tory manifesto was not written as part of a democratic process. Second, even if you read it from first to last page, the vast majority of those who voted Tory did not read that document. So the electorate did not vote for the manifesto and ipso facto that manifesto is not 'democratic' and it is disingenuous to say it was.
Less than 50% of the electorate voted for Johnson and his oven ready deal (many of the new Tory MPs were entirely unknown quantities).Somehow I don't think you will see that as anti-democratic.
In any event, the Tories are now ditching elements of their own manifesto. Is that anti-democratic? Are you outraged that they are doing so?
If you are all for inviolate rule of the electorate and that our elected representatives must reflect the views of those they represent, then will you agree that it was reprehensible that so many Tory MPs voted against the wishes of their electorate e.g. by voting for leaving for no deal last year despite coming from consitituencies that had predominantly voted Remain. Surely that was anti-democratic.
www.theguardian.com/uk-news/ng-interactive/2019/mar/27/how-did-your-mp-vote-in-the-indicative-votes#table
Anyhow, I understand that everything Johnson's government does is democratic so there is really little to be gained by having this debate.