Why can't they have a temporary home in the LibDems like a sort of Venn diagram subset or like an opposition confidence and supply arrangement.
If nothing else, Brexit has shattered the old "party for life" approach to voting that older folk have enjoyed. It's created a huge pool of "floating voters" (haven't heard that term for a while, which I don't think is an accident
) which makes polling and electing a much more volatile event.
Maybe it was going to happen anyway, and Brexit was just the catalyst ? I think I suggested (what seems like) ages ago there was an opportunity to try and seize the changes and get in front of things.
For the past 10 years, I've been amused by companies like Gartner consistently proclaiming the return of PC sales, and latterly smartphone sales when the reality is we've reached peak PC and smartphone and THE OLD DAYS ARE GONE.
See also: THE HIGH STREET
and now add: UK POLITICS.
There is no "going back". We are never going to see "the good old days". With the extra irony that the more Brexiteer types try to recreate them, the more they break them.
At the moment there are a lot of people who want the old days back. They're going to be sadly disappointed.
I'm having a rare burst of optimism (it'll wear off when the coffee does
). But the idea of somehow leap-frogging the changes and getting there before the Brexiteers does warm my cockles.
A bit.
How that translates into real life .... well a PAYG sort of approach to your political parties might be an idea ? After all, we're encouraged to switch energy suppliers. Why shouldn't political parties be subject to the same laws of the market ?
Just musing (this is good coffee !) I think people vote Tory because that's what they want to be whereas people vote Labour because that's how they see themselves. Suggesting polling figures alone are missing a dimension which may explain their flaws 


