Rory is reading the ruins in a way others aren't.
I was spoke to a local Councillor last year about a lot of things and he commented that his worry was thing locally were going to go the way of a massive wave of independents standing. He of course was for a traditional party - the LDs.
There had just been a local by election in an area, which should by rights, be prime LD fodder but was slightly more small town in its thinking and had a long history of being Labour.
It went independent, which shouldn't really have surprised anyone.
It's just a measure of how fed up people are of tribalism rather than trying to deal with and get to grips with issues.
I don't think Khan is a terrible mayor, but I do think he has fallen foul of tribalism at times, as well as being the victim of racism. He has very much played and promoted these culture wars - more than many MPs in my opinion.
So Rory standing for London Mayor as an independent? It's interesting because from what I got from friends was he was cutting through the tribalism. He was getting respect from friends who are cut from a wide range of backgrounds and political colours.
Johnson certainly launched himself as a major figure from the role and Khan is known internationally because of the attention Trump has given him.
My concern is about just how far down the culture war route Stewart will go. He has said things that make me think he's too into that identity as a liberal but he has form for substance and doing in a way other MPs don't.
What effect will it have on the election? That's a difficult one. Who does that benefit most? Him or someone else? Just how good with he be at campaigning?
I'm surprised at the move, but at the same time I also think it's a really sharp intelligent one which is very much on message with what people are actually saying...