as you have previously stated that the UK system is democratic when you get the result you want but undemocratic when you don't get the result you want
Incorrect interpretation. Point was that in UK there are always bad losers whether it is result of a GE or referendum.
1983 GE victory for Thatcher was attributed to the Falklands war according to Labour voters.
1987 GE victory Conservatives was attributed to quick profits for average person in the street from sale of nationalized companies according to labour
1992 GE victory for Conservatives was a puzzler for labour voters as they had nothing to blame.
1997 to 2010 was Labour
2010 GE which resulted in Cons and Lib coalition was attributed to financial crash according to labour.
2015 GE win for Cameron was due to Cameron's promise of a referendum according to labour
2016 referendum win for leave has, for over 3 years, being blamed on;
Leave cheated
Leave lied
Leave voters are thick
Leave voters are racist (some truth in that I would say)
So those who lose always say the winner did not play fair or they got lucky so the vote should be ignored.
The comment that when people win it is democratic and when they lose it is undemocratic is general comment on what I have seen in the UK as opposed to my own individual view.
I did not whine when Labour won the 1997 GE. Likewise if remain had won the 2016 referendum by one vote it is still a win.
I would not have not bleated like the remain supporters who, for three years, have said the vote was too close to be valid so let's do it again.
Saying best of three, best of five, best of seven, until the result is what you want to hear is a bad loser.