Yes we are. Somewhere between 13 and 62% of our laws are affected by EU rulings.
The impact of EU law varies from sector to sector. In many areas - public order, crime, defence, health - EU laws have minimal impact. But in others - workers' rights, trade - the impact is much greater because the single market and the free movement of workers are at the heart of what the EU is about. The way we organise our NHS is not."
Some of the laws passed by the EU we have to adopt. And that is now. Nothing to say if we remain that we won't be more and more entwined into the EU, until the UK ceases to exist.
Looking at it logically, I don't think the Euro can succeed long term as it is now. The countries involved are too different. Their fiscal policies are too different. Germany cannot bankroll Spain, Portugal, Italy, Greece, Ireland. The only way to control this is for rules to be brought in controlling how the countries deduct tax, award pensions, spend on healthcare etc. The main players will start to insist on more control over the smaller countries. How long until Greece defaults again and needs to be bailed out - again?
The EU will have to start forcing member states to do what it tells them. Look at what is happening now. Your arguments are that the UK is about to unleash armageddon - no food, no medicine, no industry and yet we are not as deep into Europe as some countries. Fast forward 20 years when we are even more entwined - how will we get out then? How will other countries be able to leave? They won't. The EU will have total control because no one will be able to leave. If we don't go now we waive goodbye to the UK as and independent country, of that I am sure.
We should not be so involved in any union that we cannot leave. They should not have this much control and influence over us that to leave causes near disaster. How was this allowed to happen?
You are all saying we have to stay because we can't survive alone, because the power that the EU wields in insurmountable. How can that be right?