YANBU to ask if anyone else is puzzled.YANBU to be puzzled either. Why would we do this to ourselves.
Juncker is one man who steps down next year
Yes why evaluate a hugely beneficial trading bloc with all the weird fuss about Junker? He's one person.
To evaluate the people involved you need to look at all the roles and how they rotate.
For eg The council presidency rotates on a six-monthly basis, offering each of the member states an equal role.The UK would have been in charge of the council yet again for the second half of 2017. Teresa May chose not to take up her turn, declining her planned role obviously due to the ref.
Junker's term ends soon. We have had plenty of leading roles ....
Roy Jenkins was president of the commission back in the day. To assess roles you need to look at Parliament and Council too.
Past EU elections chose many British presidents. Leading EU Individuals elected have included ...
Roy Jenkins
James Callaghan
Margaret Thatcher ( elected twice)
John Major
Tony Blair (elected twice)
-Lesser known (parliamentary) presidents have included Henry Plumb (Tory MEP) and presidents of the ECJ have included Alexander Mackenzie Stuart ( Scottish judge).
-British ECJ judges have included A. Mackenzie Stuart,
J.P. Warner,
G. Slynn ,
F.G.Jacobs,
K.H. Schiemann,
David Edwards,
Eleanor Sharpston, and Christopher Vajda
Britain not taking up its 2017 presidency of the EU Council was the first key responsibility relinquished following the referendum.
How can anyone logically justify ditching lucrative unrestricted access to a $500 trillion market just because... Junker could have once appeared drunk or arthritic? .
