NameChangerGalore
I would say the “divisions” are in the other main opposition party, where like several key policies Labour offered ‘fudge’ rather than hammered out policies between the Corbynisters and the rest of the Parliamentary Labour Party – was 50 MPs rebelling against Corbyn’s leadership and his toasting of 3-4 shadow bench MPs differences or divisions????
Labour wanted to appeal to the London etc Remain vote, and the northern Leave vote, so came up with this ridiculous leave the Single Market, keep the benefits the same, with some woolly view on EU Freedom of Movement – to keep everyone confused but happy, what leadership.
How did that just work out within the Labour Parliamentary Party?
Didn’t the trade unions recently say they want to stay in the Single Market, and is this why those Labour MPs are revolting – pretending a ‘soft’ Brexit is still possible, when the EU has said it isn’t?
My point is that as negotiations and a deal has to get past parliament, what with Labour’s Brexit split, the firm remain IN Lib Dems and SNP (plus the remainers in the Tory party) , May was clearly right to try and get a decent majority via a snap general election - and that clearly went “Pete Tong”
The EU wants to drag this out as long as possible to try and get as many tax paying UK businesses over there as possible, so if as Juncker stated they will (away from direct negotiations) only look at Brexit in Brussels for a minimal time each month – that plays into their hands, and so any government view to prolong negotiations to HELP businesses to adapt IMO is dumb.
But as least the Tories have worked out, if not for the want of listening to the EU, we cannot stay in the Single Market and also both control our borders and tell the ECJ to poke their laws where the sun don’t shine – so spending god knows how many months for that to sink in, would be a split Labour (in coalition with the SNP and Lib Dems) governments negotiating problems, not a Tory one.