Steve Peers @ stevepeers
Ripping up human rights laws could also be May's opportunity to reduce the level of protection from expulsion for EU citizens in the UK.
Chrus Pounder @ halktalk_blog
Derogating ECHR kills of any idea of adequacy re #GDPR See link below and its not in the Tory Manifesto
amberhawk.typepad.com/amberhawk/2017/01/why-the-uk-is-unlikely-to-get-an-adequacy-determination-post-brexit.html
Why the UK is unlikely to get an adequacy determination post Brexit
This blog adds two further reasons why I think a post-Brexit UK is very unlikely to offer an adequate level of protection in terms of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
One reason relates to recent comments made by Prime Minister Mrs May about human rights. The other relates to the non-compliance of the national security agencies with their existing data protection obligations under the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA).
Steve Peers @ stevepeers
Good point. Limiting human rights laws might complicate UK/EU data flows which (among other things) help to...combat terrorism
Let's get this straight. May's attack on human rights is none compatible with an EU deal and EU anti terrorism cooperation.
It's not in the manifesto so the Salisbury convention doesn't apply.
I suspect the executive could apply for a temporary suspension and bypass parliament. But they have to go to the EHCR to do that.
The GFA relies on the EHCR so she can't just walk away from it without destroying the GFA.
She makes a big song and dance about this two days before an election when she's on the back foot with her track record on security.