(Torygraph paywall) Michel Barnier: What he says and what he really means 
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/03/michel-barnier-chief-brexit-negotiator-says-really-means/
At his press conference in Brussels today ...
“The UK must put a great deal of energy and effort into these three issues over the next weeks and months.”
What he really meant:
“We Europeans, with our teams of experienced negotiators and European Commission lawyers, have got all our ducks nicely in a row – and we think you Brits are seriously underestimating how complex this task is going to be.
I’m not sure what you’ve been doing in Whitehall these past ten months since the Brexit vote, but you need to get up to speed.
Pronto.
“Some have created the illusion that Brexit will have no material impact on our lives and that negotiations can be concluded quickly and painlessly. This is not the case.”
What he really meant:
That means you – Boris Johnson and David Davis, running around telling everyone the UK will end up with pretty much the “exact same” access to Europe after Brexit.
Well, you won’t – and frankly it annoys us when you make those sorts of glib pronouncements.
“We need legal precision and this will take time.”
What he really meant:
There seems to be a belief in London that the British can move rapidly on to the trade talks phase just by offering some vague political assurances that the UK will protect the rights of the 3m EU citizens living in the UK and settle up its bills, so long as the EU27 give you an attractive trade deal.
Well, forget it. This is the European Commission you’re talking about there. We want chapter and verse.
That means legally watertight guarantees that you Brits cannot suddenly go back on when the negotiations on a future relationship deal get tough towards the end – IF we get to that point, that is.
“Citizens’ rights. These are our first priority – these men women children have to be able to continue to live as they live today and for life.”
What he really meant:
Basically, whatever EU citizens arrived in Britain expecting they would receive, before Brexit came along, needs to be preserved.
*
“[These rights]…have to be guaranteed by the Court of Justice of the European Union”.*
What he really meant:
We don’t trust you. These citizens’ rights – to pensions, benefits, residence, education – are founded on EU law, so it must be the ECJ that is the institution that enforces the deal.
If not, how can we be sure that the Brits, once free from EU membership, won’t renege on the deal?
“This money is committed to projects throughout Europe… thousands of local authorities and businesses are involved in these projects… you can imagine the political and legal problems that were to arise… were those projects to be shortened.”
What he really meant:
We want certainty and continuity, and that means you Brits need to pay up, because all the EU 27 leaders (who I work for) say they don’t want to.
.....don’t think you Brits can threaten the EU 27 by refusing to pay up and just walk away.
We’ll pursue you through the courts and you won’t get a trade deal.
“The EU 27 is on track to make sure that UK withdrawal happens in an orderly fashion. The UK decision has now caused 10 months of uncertainty. We need to remove that uncertainty and it is high time to start negotiation. The clock is ticking.”
What he really meant:
We’ve had quite enough dithering around now, and we aren’t exactly thrilled
at Theresa May’s decision to call a general election.
May we just remind you of the Article 50 ‘ratchet’.
The more you delay, the closer you will get to the “cliff edge” and the less likely it is you will get the outlines of a trade deal agreed.
We don’t intend to be helpful, either, unless you agree to what we want on the money part, or the question of the ECJ (see above)