an independent investigation into the benefits, risks and costs of Brexit before making plans.
I don't think that should happen, but if it does, I sincerely hope it won't be about money alone. Many of the reasons for leaving the EU can't be measured in that way. For a start, the wellbeing from finally knowing you're well away from a bloc whose structure and ultimate aims you strongly disagree with. I don't want to risk our country one day being under the control of a superstate (and even, perhaps, a one-world government in the long term).
This group clearly aren't impartial, as they neglect to mention that misrepresentations and exaggerations occurred on both sides of the debate and therefore its "influence" would have worked both ways.
I'm certain that when people voted, they expected the result to be carried out. So it would be a "misrepresentation" of what the referendum was for, to let people believe this if it wasn't true. What's the point of it otherwise? "Advisory" might as well mean "pointless" and "sham" if it's going to be undemocratically ignored. Particularly as I doubt very much these attempts to manipulate the outcome would be going on if "remain" had won.