Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Brexit

Why I Voted to Leave the EU

394 replies

Asprilla11 · 26/06/2016 19:19

So I recently started a thread about the misconceptions many remain voters may have about why people voted leave. I argued that there were many reasons other than immigration and that the majority voted fully understanding what the outcome would mean.

On that thread and many more on MN the remain voters keep asking us WHY we voted and are annoyed when we don't answer in full, they forget that since the result SOME have acted in an aggressive and belittling manner towards us, so why would we feel engaged to reply? Many leave voters have had to spend time defending themselves because we have all been branded thick and racist. We are more than aware some racist people voted to leave in order to pursue their disgusting agenda, most leave voters don't want to be associated with those people and we condemn their stance.

I am willing to say my reasons why I voted leave, even if it means I am attacked for doing so.

EU Commissioners

They are not democratically elected (by EU Citizens) and the President has the final say on any candidate that a member state has put forward. Technically they are accountable to the European Parliament by the fact that the Parliament is able to force the entire Commission to resign through a vote of no confidence. However the Parliament has never done this, but have threatened to do it once. It also needs 2/3 of the Parliament to vote and agree on the reason for the no confidence vote. We can elect MEP's but they have little power over the commissioners.

The commissioners are paid nearly £200,000 per year (some more) and also get generous allowances, benefits and a very good pension. I do not believe the current commission deserve that level of pay, they simply have not earned it, I believe they put their own self interests above EU citizens and I believe they are morally and financially corrupt. If they were worth the salary then the amount would be fine, I just don't think they currently are.

EU Economy

There is very little growth and it is only going to get worse if the Eurozone fully collapses which I feel is a real possibility. Struggling EU nations such as Greece, Spain, Portugal and Italy are in massive debt, suffering with austerity and massive youth unemployment. I don't believe many of the of the other EU nations care about this, as long as the wealth benefits their country then they will pay lip service to those who are less fortunate. I also believe a lot of the benefits of the EU economy and the trade it brings also benefits the wealthier members of society more than the poor, in all of the EU member states.

If the EU had showed they would reform and a new fairer commission was set up which looked at making deals fairer for all EU member states and also looked at immigration in depth (not necessarily changing it) then I would have voted remain without a second thought. However the commission proved what an arrogant bunch they are even before Cameron went to get his 'deal', they won't reform, they don't want to and they don't care who knows it.

UK Economy

The UK will be 6-8 billion pounds better off after no longer paying the EU membership fee, even after the grants we used to receive are taken in to account. However there were several studies that pointed out that the loss in trade will far outweigh the savings from leaving the EU and we will actually be worse off financially. I didn't doubt some of the facts in those studies and I could see how they came to their conclusions, however even those studies have to admit they can't say for certain because nobody knows how quickly we will get new trade agreements with EU member states and how favorably they will be. Additionally although EU membership did not prevent trade deals with the commonwealth and other countries, it did reduce the need and the imagination to. It is only when those deals are in place can you truly say leaving the EU has left us worse or better off. In the short-term we will be worse off, I knew that risk prior to voting.

As a Labour supporter and also someone who is very distrusting of the current Tory Government I can hand on heart easily say that not a single thing Farage, Gove, Johnson and Duncan Smith said I believed at face value. In fact I consider Gove as one of the worst Education ministers ever and IDS I hold responsible for the suicide of some disabled benefit claimants, such an odious man. So believe me the leave MP's definitely didn't impress or influence me!

I did my own research which I always do whenever the Government (any party) state things as 'facts'. I knew the £350 million claim would be wrong (which remain supporters kept shouting was lies) however I also knew the Governments claim that every household in the UK would be £4300 worse off was also wrong, but do you get the leave voters shouting lies? Both sides lied, that is a fact!

Since the crash in 2008 many, many people in the UK (not just the British) have not seen any improvement in their wages or living standards. They have borne the brunt of austerity more than the people who could afford to. The 5th biggest economy in the world and an economy that has recovered and grown still has not brought any benefits to the poor and working class. They didn't consider how leaving the EU would affect their ISA's, Savings, Stocks and Shares because they don't have any! They didn't think about if their child could go to Uni because they would never have been able to afford that anyway. The poor and working class in the UK and the EU don't care if they are a bit worse off for a few more years, they are sick of the wealth that is generated only benefiting the wealthy, this was their chance to be heard.

Immigration

I wasn't going to mention this as it did not play much of a part (if any) in my decision and I also feel like as a leave supporter I have to keep defending myself whenever the word immigration is mentioned, simply because the remain voters keep saying we are all racist.

But here goes.

I worked in the Civil Service from the age of 19 for 15 years. I worked with people of all ages, all religions, all nationalities, LGBT and disabled people too. I matured as an adult in this environment and it undoubtedly made my life richer. I was also a Union Rep and defended colleagues in disciplinary, poor performance/attendance, diversity and disabilities (covered by the Equality Act 2010) meetings and hearings , both british and non-british. Since I left I have kept in touch with former colleagues who are now lifelong friends, some are British, some aren't, it wasn't a factor in whether we became friends or not.

I only mention all of that simply because a lot of remain voters think we have no positive outlook on immigrants and we don't mix in a multi-cultural society. They also think we don't understand the positive impact on the economy migrants (EU and non-EU) have. But actually most leave voters do, immigrants pay far more in to the system than they take out in benefits, that's a long standing, well known fact. There are far more british people who falsely claim benefits compared to immigrants.

Unfortunately I will admit there are parts of society, some of which voted leave who don't understand these truths. Some through lack of education, some through lack of life experience with people of diverse backgrounds and some sadly who are racist. These are the people who already felt poor, cut-off and unheard. UKIP and other politicians preyed on those peoples fears and told them they could help fix their problems.

That is not however the majority of leave supporters, I truly believe that. Most leave supporters have had experiences like mine and we all have experienced nothing but positive things from working and living with immigrants, EU and non-EU.

If the EU could have done one thing with immigration then I wish it gave all EU member states the ability to put a temporary block or cap on EU migration. I say this for the simple fact that the UK and other countries don't have the housing, schools and hospitals to cope with the current UK (not british) population growth, we simply aren't building enough of anything. When you add over 300,000 immigrants to that population growth you start to see the strain it creates.

I think the UK can cope with immigration well above 200,000, when it has the infrastructure in place, until then a temporary reduction or block until the work is done would be a useful tool to have. Alternatively you could look at using builders from the EU countries who could then come and work on those very buildings that are needed.

Finally on immigration, I think Governments in all EU countries need to act more responsibly on where and how immigrants are placed in to communities. Dumping some of the poorest immigrants in the poorest parts of the UK next to communities who are experiencing crime, unemployment and disillusionment with life in general and their prospects, is a disaster waiting to happen, especially when some of those people are known racists.

UK employers, EU employers and landlords in and out of the EU also need to be challenged more on their blatant exploitation of immigrants.

Ok flame away!

OP posts:
SnowBells · 27/06/2016 11:38

Chris1234567890

Read my response further up above.

SnowBells · 27/06/2016 11:41

I can't believe people are so short-sighted and look at the money as a Paid-into-the-EU and Receive-from-the-EU equation. Oh my God. I can't believe people actually fell for that. This is not primary school where you just have one subtraction. It's more like Linear Algebra, where there are many different variables.

roundaboutthetown · 27/06/2016 11:54

If the markets are stabilising, it's because they think any Brexit negotiated will enable business as usual... not increased equality and fairness. This is still unfettered capitalism at work, in fact more so. The EU got right in the way of unfettered capitalism.

Joysmum · 27/06/2016 11:56

Snowbells that's something we agree on. I suspect we have much we do despite being on opposite sides of the fence.

For me it's purely that our opportunities for growth by hitching to the wagon if the emerging world economies greatly exceed those of looking inwards to the EU. The EU limits both the vision and the abilities of those with vision to make the most of world markets.

roundaboutthetown · 27/06/2016 11:57

Or do people really think Farage, Gove and Johnson wanted greater equality?

Joysmum · 27/06/2016 12:00

Or do people really think Farage, Gove and Johnson wanted greater equality?

Like hell did they!

Aberchips · 27/06/2016 12:01

Some great & well made points SnowBells.
I do appreciate that there are some Leave voters that have made a carefully considered decision about the way they voted, but for every one of those there is the knee jerk, vote Leave, stick it to the Establishment voter. These people had no idea why they were voting Leave (& indeed are now expressing regret & dismay that they "didn't think it would actually count").

Those that made a protest vote against David Cameron - yes he is now gone, but likely you will have Boris Johnson or Michael Gove as your next PM - either of which is a terrifying prospect. A very right wing Tory government & an opposition who are currently also destroying themselves from the outside in. Not a great combination.
The NHS won't magically be "saved" because we're not paying into the EU any more.
Nobody will want to put investment into the country in the next 2-5 years because of the uncetainty of how the economy will look or what our trading arrangements will be.
The pound is down, everything will now be more expensive. We've been downgraded by all the ratings agencies meaning the UK will find it more difficult to borrow.
A country whose financial & political structures are in a complete mess - I'm sure all the other EU countries are so jealous of us all at the moment.
So excuse me for thinking that a Leave vote just wasn't maybe the "magic bullet" that people think it was going to be.

SnowBells · 27/06/2016 12:06

Joysmum

See, this is the thing. I COMPLETELY agree with your sentiment, but most people come up with arguments that can be debunked so easily, it's unreal.

I agree we need to reach out to the emerging world, but right now might not be the right time, given they're in trouble, too... China's economy is a bit of a time bomb, to be honest, and we have to be careful about that. Shock

Joysmum · 27/06/2016 12:07

I do appreciate that there are some Leave voters that have made a carefully considered decision about the way they voted, but for every one of those there is the knee jerk, vote Leave, stick it to the Establishment voter

Based on that reasoning this means that basically 3/4 of the population voted based on reasoning. That gives us a good chance of not being doomed by anyone who voted on a knee jerk reaction or those only based on one issue.

roundaboutthetown · 27/06/2016 12:07

As a matter of interest, what are we planning to trade with India, China and the Commonwealth? What do we make or do that is of particular interest to them?

freetrampolineforall · 27/06/2016 12:07

Thank you for the reasoned arguments but I won't thank you for ending the uk. No Scotland - no uk. It really is as simple as that.

Joysmum · 27/06/2016 12:10

Snowbells Smile

The reason I think now was the time is because the longer we are in, the more enmeshed we'll be.

We're at the point of no return when we can't get out without the fallout being too great to bear.

Many of those who I know that voted to remain did so my because of a resounding belief that the EU was best for us, but because they were too scared to leave.

roundaboutthetown · 27/06/2016 12:10

And if our small businesses can't cope with EU red tape, how well will they cope with different rules for every country they deal with?

Aberchips · 27/06/2016 12:11

Joysmum - only if all the people in both sides of the campaign were telling the truth 100% of the time.

Aberchips · 27/06/2016 12:14

Also you totally missed my point. Most of these people didn't give a shit about whether we were actually in the EU or not - or what the wider implications of the vote would be. They just thought - Dave wants In, lets vote Out.

Joysmum · 27/06/2016 12:18

Ah but one persons truth if the next persons perception of lies.

I remember my first lesson of pure economics when I was 16 and my teacher said we needed to get used to using the word "assume" and get used to thinking that way as there were so many variables it was impossible not to study the theories without this.

The top economists in the world have a history of incorrectly predicting and forecasting because the truth isn't that straightforward.

fourmummy · 27/06/2016 12:19

This is still unfettered capitalism at work, in fact more so Agree, but at least we can do something about it.
The EU got right in the way of unfettered capitalism Completely disagree. Really, really disagree with this. So much evidence to counter this.

roundaboutthetown · 27/06/2016 12:20

What evidence?

SnowBells · 27/06/2016 12:33

Joysmum

I have the viewpoint that the EU will hold on for a while, and currently, the costs of leaving is too much to bear when our economy is a little sh*t(Sorry for being blunt, but it is), regardless to what happens with the EU.

I'd start the trade relationships with China & Co. when we and they are ready. We're far from that point. China is a bit of a difficult market to enter without local people who speak the language and look the part (politically incorrect, but from what I know, that's China for you).

And, yeah... we need to make products they actually want.

There is APEC. But we'd be a bit of an odd one out, given we're not anywhere in that region unless we ship our island to the middle of the pacific. Somewhere near Fiji would be nice. Wink

SnowBells · 27/06/2016 12:35

Oh... and China's red tape will put the EU's red tape to shame... Grin. And it will be expensive, and I can imagine FIFA type scandals emerging from that relationship.

Chris1234567890 · 27/06/2016 12:39

Yes I did read it snowbells. Let me respond.

To complain about the House of Lords is a moot point. We have the democratic political structure we have individually, democratically voted for. At this time, that includes a House of Lords. Its role is to sit as a second legislature and its existance, is there with the agreement of the UK electorate. That is we continue to vote to keep it.
The debate over the validity of such a house has gone on for decades and will continue for decades. Lobby your MP to have the HoLs removed. At every general election you can let your voice be heard. You can vote for the party that calls for the HoLs to be disbanded. If your political party, refuses to put that request on their manifesto, you can either lobby your prefered political party to do so, you could join your political party to ensure it is included in their manifesto, or you can create a political party to do just as you wish. But as it stands, the House of Lords exists, BECAUSE, the voting democratic population wish it to.
The same applies to the Monarchy. Lobby for a republic fine, but dont be dissapointed or claim democracy doesnt work, when the majority vote to retain a monarch. The fact the Queen her self is, unelected, is the moot point. We, as a democracy, want to live in a Kingdom.

Where democratic membership of the EU falls down, (in an attempt to parrallel the two arguments), weve just voted out. Thats it. Whether you perceive the EU council to be in itself, democratic or not, we have just this week, used our democratic right, to vote out. Exactly the same principles apply.

Cameron committed to hold this referendum, when asking the electorate to decide back in the general election. He won a landslide victory. The referendum itself, was voted for by the people, it had to happen.

Let me go back to your original post, to respond to your next bit. Back in a mo.

Aberchips · 27/06/2016 12:53

True Joysmum but we do have the benefit of hindsight & the knowledge of how things can go terribly wrong once countries start acting completely in their own interests/ isolating themselves from others.

On a different note, as someone who has direct experience of trying to negotiate with Chinese businesses, that is definitely one trade deal I wouldn't like to be responsible for!

SnowBells · 27/06/2016 13:09

Chris1234567890

You will find that the support for the House of Lords is actually low. MUCH lower than the vote to leave the EU. There have been calls for it to be reformed, but as with the EU the parliamentary structure is unwieldy and archaic (I'd say even more archaic as it... is. so. old.)

FFS, they can't even address each other by their real names, and have weird rules like we're still in medieval times. BUT that also means there's a lot of pomp and circumstance with the red gowns and that which some people are oddly fascinated about. They make the guys in Brussels look like the most boring dudes on Earth (which some of them probably are).

Anyway... so despite so few people supporting an unelected House of Lords in its current format, no one does a thing.

Regarding lobbying your MP and voting a party... from my observation of UK society in general (having lived abroad in my youth), that's not how the majority of people vote. Many don't even look at the manifesto. Many people vote the same party for XX years, regardless of the manifesto. And there are some who say, "My heart is with the LibDems, but I want to back a winning team." (Yes... actual quote, and a lot of people actually say this in one form or another).

My area has had a Tory MP for two decades. Most people who move into the area and want to vote another party believe their vote is wasted and just won't count. I think proportional representation would help, but as I said... changing the way politics is run in the UK is difficult. We can't complain about the EU with currently 28 member states, when we can't even sort our own sh*t out.

Chris1234567890 · 27/06/2016 13:18

UK economy. I think I did indeed answer your points. My view, as a life long capitalist supporter, (wealth, brings tax, brings welfare pot) shifted to 'leave' for the reasons Ive explained. My vote was the shock vote that swung this referendum, not the anticipated UKIP, BNP who've always been out there. But the previous, capitalist supporting, middle englander. If you feel my view is wrong then so be it. You are entitled to your view. However, my view isnt irrelevant. The leave vote won. Ive explained my reasons, the OP has explained her reasons. You feel those reasons are fundamentally wrong, I dont. I came to my decision on the facts before us, the reality of our membership in the EU and how it has impacted us as a nation.
Your arguments, the whole 'what if' are conjecture. That is why, IMO, the remain campaign failed. It was the remains who refused to acknowledge the reality of EU membership, instead hanging their hat on a whole raft of speculation of how much worse it will be 'out'. Speculation was never going to be enough to swing my vote on such an important issue, hence the decision was made on past performance, and the EUs very clear message, that Britain would continue to have no say on the decisions it came to.

SnowBells · 27/06/2016 13:30

Chris1234567890

The 'what if' scenario, unfortunately, is becoming real. Look, I don't want it to happen... but it is happening. I don't want to out myself, but talks are going on behind closed doors at major firms. A lot of people know that. Unless the UK arranges some sort of deal that will p*ss off a lot of Leave voters who wanted immigration to be controlled and nothing else.

That's the thing really.... a lot of Leave voters want different things. It will be impossible to please them all. The Leavers camp is so varied (hence, the whole racist / not racist thing). Leavers all want something, but not the same thing - really, you are not really one big group of Leavers. While us Remainers have more in common because we are sticking to the status quo / the known thing.

Whoever has to implement Brexit will be finished. It's basically a poisoned chalice, and they know it all too well.

Thanks for discussing. I finally found people who actually want to discuss!!! Smile I've been rebuffed in real life and other forums all the time.

Swipe left for the next trending thread