Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Brexit

Why I Voted to Leave the EU

394 replies

Asprilla11 · 26/06/2016 19:19

So I recently started a thread about the misconceptions many remain voters may have about why people voted leave. I argued that there were many reasons other than immigration and that the majority voted fully understanding what the outcome would mean.

On that thread and many more on MN the remain voters keep asking us WHY we voted and are annoyed when we don't answer in full, they forget that since the result SOME have acted in an aggressive and belittling manner towards us, so why would we feel engaged to reply? Many leave voters have had to spend time defending themselves because we have all been branded thick and racist. We are more than aware some racist people voted to leave in order to pursue their disgusting agenda, most leave voters don't want to be associated with those people and we condemn their stance.

I am willing to say my reasons why I voted leave, even if it means I am attacked for doing so.

EU Commissioners

They are not democratically elected (by EU Citizens) and the President has the final say on any candidate that a member state has put forward. Technically they are accountable to the European Parliament by the fact that the Parliament is able to force the entire Commission to resign through a vote of no confidence. However the Parliament has never done this, but have threatened to do it once. It also needs 2/3 of the Parliament to vote and agree on the reason for the no confidence vote. We can elect MEP's but they have little power over the commissioners.

The commissioners are paid nearly £200,000 per year (some more) and also get generous allowances, benefits and a very good pension. I do not believe the current commission deserve that level of pay, they simply have not earned it, I believe they put their own self interests above EU citizens and I believe they are morally and financially corrupt. If they were worth the salary then the amount would be fine, I just don't think they currently are.

EU Economy

There is very little growth and it is only going to get worse if the Eurozone fully collapses which I feel is a real possibility. Struggling EU nations such as Greece, Spain, Portugal and Italy are in massive debt, suffering with austerity and massive youth unemployment. I don't believe many of the of the other EU nations care about this, as long as the wealth benefits their country then they will pay lip service to those who are less fortunate. I also believe a lot of the benefits of the EU economy and the trade it brings also benefits the wealthier members of society more than the poor, in all of the EU member states.

If the EU had showed they would reform and a new fairer commission was set up which looked at making deals fairer for all EU member states and also looked at immigration in depth (not necessarily changing it) then I would have voted remain without a second thought. However the commission proved what an arrogant bunch they are even before Cameron went to get his 'deal', they won't reform, they don't want to and they don't care who knows it.

UK Economy

The UK will be 6-8 billion pounds better off after no longer paying the EU membership fee, even after the grants we used to receive are taken in to account. However there were several studies that pointed out that the loss in trade will far outweigh the savings from leaving the EU and we will actually be worse off financially. I didn't doubt some of the facts in those studies and I could see how they came to their conclusions, however even those studies have to admit they can't say for certain because nobody knows how quickly we will get new trade agreements with EU member states and how favorably they will be. Additionally although EU membership did not prevent trade deals with the commonwealth and other countries, it did reduce the need and the imagination to. It is only when those deals are in place can you truly say leaving the EU has left us worse or better off. In the short-term we will be worse off, I knew that risk prior to voting.

As a Labour supporter and also someone who is very distrusting of the current Tory Government I can hand on heart easily say that not a single thing Farage, Gove, Johnson and Duncan Smith said I believed at face value. In fact I consider Gove as one of the worst Education ministers ever and IDS I hold responsible for the suicide of some disabled benefit claimants, such an odious man. So believe me the leave MP's definitely didn't impress or influence me!

I did my own research which I always do whenever the Government (any party) state things as 'facts'. I knew the £350 million claim would be wrong (which remain supporters kept shouting was lies) however I also knew the Governments claim that every household in the UK would be £4300 worse off was also wrong, but do you get the leave voters shouting lies? Both sides lied, that is a fact!

Since the crash in 2008 many, many people in the UK (not just the British) have not seen any improvement in their wages or living standards. They have borne the brunt of austerity more than the people who could afford to. The 5th biggest economy in the world and an economy that has recovered and grown still has not brought any benefits to the poor and working class. They didn't consider how leaving the EU would affect their ISA's, Savings, Stocks and Shares because they don't have any! They didn't think about if their child could go to Uni because they would never have been able to afford that anyway. The poor and working class in the UK and the EU don't care if they are a bit worse off for a few more years, they are sick of the wealth that is generated only benefiting the wealthy, this was their chance to be heard.

Immigration

I wasn't going to mention this as it did not play much of a part (if any) in my decision and I also feel like as a leave supporter I have to keep defending myself whenever the word immigration is mentioned, simply because the remain voters keep saying we are all racist.

But here goes.

I worked in the Civil Service from the age of 19 for 15 years. I worked with people of all ages, all religions, all nationalities, LGBT and disabled people too. I matured as an adult in this environment and it undoubtedly made my life richer. I was also a Union Rep and defended colleagues in disciplinary, poor performance/attendance, diversity and disabilities (covered by the Equality Act 2010) meetings and hearings , both british and non-british. Since I left I have kept in touch with former colleagues who are now lifelong friends, some are British, some aren't, it wasn't a factor in whether we became friends or not.

I only mention all of that simply because a lot of remain voters think we have no positive outlook on immigrants and we don't mix in a multi-cultural society. They also think we don't understand the positive impact on the economy migrants (EU and non-EU) have. But actually most leave voters do, immigrants pay far more in to the system than they take out in benefits, that's a long standing, well known fact. There are far more british people who falsely claim benefits compared to immigrants.

Unfortunately I will admit there are parts of society, some of which voted leave who don't understand these truths. Some through lack of education, some through lack of life experience with people of diverse backgrounds and some sadly who are racist. These are the people who already felt poor, cut-off and unheard. UKIP and other politicians preyed on those peoples fears and told them they could help fix their problems.

That is not however the majority of leave supporters, I truly believe that. Most leave supporters have had experiences like mine and we all have experienced nothing but positive things from working and living with immigrants, EU and non-EU.

If the EU could have done one thing with immigration then I wish it gave all EU member states the ability to put a temporary block or cap on EU migration. I say this for the simple fact that the UK and other countries don't have the housing, schools and hospitals to cope with the current UK (not british) population growth, we simply aren't building enough of anything. When you add over 300,000 immigrants to that population growth you start to see the strain it creates.

I think the UK can cope with immigration well above 200,000, when it has the infrastructure in place, until then a temporary reduction or block until the work is done would be a useful tool to have. Alternatively you could look at using builders from the EU countries who could then come and work on those very buildings that are needed.

Finally on immigration, I think Governments in all EU countries need to act more responsibly on where and how immigrants are placed in to communities. Dumping some of the poorest immigrants in the poorest parts of the UK next to communities who are experiencing crime, unemployment and disillusionment with life in general and their prospects, is a disaster waiting to happen, especially when some of those people are known racists.

UK employers, EU employers and landlords in and out of the EU also need to be challenged more on their blatant exploitation of immigrants.

Ok flame away!

OP posts:
NotAClueReally3 · 26/06/2016 21:31

This is the best explanation I've seen. Thanks for sharing it as it makes me feel somewhat less panicky, moving forward.

Muddlingthroughtoo · 26/06/2016 21:32

Aspirilla, thankyou for putting into words what I have been trying to convey. It's like you read my mind.

Asprilla11 · 26/06/2016 21:32

franke & babybythesea

No problem, I realise that both sides are never going to agree, but if both sides can put forward their reasons and the other side acknowledges them even if they don't agree with them, then that's all we can hope for.

People from both sides are going to be needed to move forward so respect and understanding is what we need.

OP posts:
ClaudiaApfelstrudel · 26/06/2016 21:36

so when we finally settle down to negotiate these supposed 'great deals'

the side we are negotiating with has 27 different vetos, so we are going to have to convince 27 different countries that our 'trade deals' are beneficial to them and if one doesn't like it that's the end.

all of those deals will include free movement of people

can someone please explain to me what is 'great' about leaving? we are f*cked I'm afraid

ClaudiaApfelstrudel · 26/06/2016 21:36

our only hope now is that the Tories are too afraid to invoke article 50

bringonyourwreckingball · 26/06/2016 21:39

Ok that's what you voted against, I disagree with you but I lost so whatever. But what did you vote FOR? What, for you, constitutes a good outcome? Because it seems to me that the out vote encompasses so many different opinions that there's no outcome that will make all of you remotely happy. The anti immigration people aren't going to get what they want whatever. The undemocratic EU people will probably find we either end up in the EEA so nothing changes but we lose our opt outs and have no future influence on policy or we get back 'sovereignty' whatever the fuck that means but our economy tanks and we can't afford to do do anything. So seriously, what is the plan?

Boogers · 26/06/2016 21:40

It was a blind leap into the dark

Yes it was, but I don't believe we have the diplomats in place to negotiate trade deals outside the EU within the time frame needed to save jobs.

I have several friends who work at the Nissan plant in Washington, a company who have expressed doubts, even before the referendum was called, about trading outside the EU. TATA steel in Middlesbrough had interested buyers but only if we trade inside the EU. This is what I asked my 'leaver' friends before Thursday when I said "what happens next?"

It takes an average of 6.4 years to negotiate a trade deal and tariffs. By then Nissan and TATA might be done. It might have been useful to have a backup plan if Leave won. As it is, it's like trying to pull a rabbit out of the hat when you don't have a hat.

Asprilla11 · 26/06/2016 21:44

I can't keep up! Thank you all for your kind words, it was hard for me to put my reasons and feelings in to words but I am glad I tried. Not bad for someone who got in to trouble in High School and left without a single GCSE at A-C grade!

Once the dust settles it also shows the UK can carry out a divisive referendum and the people can still get on and move forward. For some countries, even in the EU, they wouldn't even get as far as a vote on such important matters.

OP posts:
babybythesea · 26/06/2016 21:46

And now I've read beyond your first vote, I'll add:
I do disagree that the government should have planned. Or more accurately, I think they should have had some idea of where to go just in case. But I think the onus was really on Boris et al to have the plans. Not details, necessarily, but some thought about where to go next, and how (as in - we feel the next step is to..., we will aim to hold talks with...,). I don't really know, just something, not sloping off and leaving what feels like a political vacuum. I had hoped that since they had won (not Farage, since he is not in government and has no power anyway), they would be spending the weekend giving some idea of where they see it going next. The apparent absence makes it feel more like 'Oh shit. We have no idea what to do now.' And it just compounds the sense I have that this is really not going to go well.

I would also say that I suspect you have over-estimated the numbers of leavers who voted with the common sense you showed. I have 'debated' it with two people in RL. One wanted power back for this country. When I asked exactly what he meant, what powers he was concerned that the EU had, he shrugged. The other said he didn't see the benefit of the money spent by the EU in our area. We are in Cornwall. I listed the rail links and the road links and the energy plant and and and - his response was that none of that was in his immediate area so he hadn't benefitted at all. I can only reach the conclusion he meant the EU hadn't paid his mortgage. And beyond that, two people I know in RL that I haven't discussed it with but they have posted on FB about 'taking back our jobs from the immigrants' and 'protecting our children's jobs from incomers'. (Our children are 6 and 7, I wasn't aware their jobs needed protecting just yet).

So I had reached the conclusion that most Brexiters had absolutely no idea of the reality of what they were voting for. I am pleased you did, thanks again for explaining.

tilder · 26/06/2016 21:46

It was nice and articulate. Doesn't mean I agree with it or think leaving is a good idea.

Fwiw I don't think all those who voted for Brexit are racist. It can't be denied though that a certain, unknown proportion are and now feel validated in their views. The far right is on the march. It's terrifying.

I still really don't understand how leave voters can be so sanguine about the utter lack of a plan from here. The belief that deals will be made that are better than we had. It's deeply irresponsible.

We've been trying for years to set up bigger, better trade deals outside the EU. Am sure these will miraculously bear amazing fruit now as China, India Australia etc flock to our new and improved shores.

Am sure manufacturing will rocket (might do if average wages drop enough to make us a more cost effective option).

Am glad you're all so positive. So blasé about another recession.

As our wonderful country splits from its closest friends, then probably splits internally.

Enjoy.

WaitroseTrolley · 26/06/2016 21:47

Thanks for starting this thread OP. I was also desperate to ask Leavers for their reasons. If you or any others have any links to anything that helped you decide, that would be much appreciated.

tabulahrasa · 26/06/2016 21:54

"Am glad you're all so positive. So blasé about another recession."

It's not even stuff like that, recessions are bad, but usually survivable.

It is more things like Northern Ireland, either we put up borders and completely destroy a generation of peace after everything it took to get that or we have an open border with Europe and then what is the point of even taking about controls on immigration?

Terryscombover · 26/06/2016 21:58

No flaming from me, a very reasonable position.

I work in a sector that will be destroyed by leaving the EU (not banking). It's a sector with many EU and non EU immigrants. It pays very well so tax receipts are high. I cannot fathom how reducing tax income will help us.

ApocalypseSlough · 26/06/2016 21:58

Rabid remainer here and no flaming from me. You voted in accordance with your beliefs and research. But the margin was narrow and many voted misguidedly- against Sharia Law, to keep the immigrants out, to show Cameron a lesson. Most importantly now we've voted Leave nothing is happening there's no will or stomach for it.
If article 50 is implemented I'll shut up but until then, anyone who has doubts should sign this and this

lljkk · 26/06/2016 22:04

UK is no longer 5th largest economy in world. Just saying...

BoatyMcBoat · 26/06/2016 22:05

As the PM at the time of the referendum, Cameron should have had a plan, at least an outline of one, for each possible outcome. Instead he's run away and left us all in the lurch. He must have known that there was at least a glimmer of a possibility that Leave would win, unless he's quite incredibly stupid. I am very, very angry that he's resigned. Disgusting, dishonourable behaviour. I hope he goes down in history as the coward and the cad that he has shown himself to be.

I said on one of these threads that no one I know who voted to Leave did so because of immigrants, no one. Asprilla has articulated much better than I why they voted as they did.

Asprilla11 · 26/06/2016 22:22

BoatyMcBoat

The Government acted arrogantly and irresponsibly, they believed most people would vote to remain simply because they told them to and because they produced literature and people who sent out a message of fear.

So they didn't plan, even though they could have and should have. I was still a Civil Servant when the Scottish Independence vote was approaching, the UK government department I worked for refused to plan in the event of Scotland leaving, they simply believed they wouldn't do it.

OP posts:
tabulahrasa · 26/06/2016 22:27

"As the PM at the time of the referendum, Cameron should have had a plan, at least an outline of one, for each possible outcome."

He should have had a plan to deal with this period of time - but it was the most obvious thing in the world that he was never going to negotiate the exit, how could he? He argued against it.

"The Government acted arrogantly and irresponsibly, they believed most people would vote to remain simply because they told them to and because they produced literature and people who sent out a message of fear."

I'm pretty sure they expected people to vote remain because there simply wasn't any ideas from leave about how anything would work afterwards...that they didn't expect so many people to gamble with an entire country.

So no, they weren't who were acting arrogantly and irresponsibly.

LastGirlOnTheLeft · 26/06/2016 22:43

OP any one of the people who voted remain could have carried out the same research as you. That is why I absolutely HATED the constant demands of the people who voted Remain (oh yeah, I did that by the way!! But I wouldn't again!) for Leave voters to explain WHY they voted the way they did.

Remain voters take pride in research yet your post is all news to us? Pull the other one!

It looked like bullying because it WAS bullying.

Asprilla11 · 26/06/2016 22:49

LastGirlOnTheLeft I think a lot of remain voters did most (not all) of their research on financial factors, both for themselves and their children.

Which is correct and sensible, but I think some Remain voters don't understand the depth of inequality many people in the UK and the EU feel. For those people the financial arguments were not on the same page.

OP posts:
tabulahrasa · 26/06/2016 22:51

"Which is correct and sensible, but I think some Remain voters don't understand the depth of inequality many people in the UK and the EU feel."

Nope, did the research, waited to see what it was that they were thinking about moving forward and how the envisioned Britain afterwards...realised there was nothing coming and decided I wasn't stupid enough to vote for that.

roundaboutthetown · 26/06/2016 23:05

I didn't vote remain to protect my finances, I voted remain because I thought the people likely to be negotiating our exit were people who were going to be thinking about their personal finances and therefore negotiating deals that will, ultimately, increase inequality still further, enrich big business and cause a massive rise in nationalism and racism across Europe. Voting out when you have an extremely right wing government in power, a Labour Party in chaos and a currently particularly unstable world around you is highly unlikely to result in a good deal for the UK or the rest of the world. It might hasten what was inevitable, I guess, but I don't find that very reassuring, tbh.

caitlinohara · 26/06/2016 23:05

Asprilla Thanks for this thread. I am a Labour party member and I voted Leave for essentially the same reasons. I've said this on another thread, but 48% of the population calling the other 52% stupid and racist is divisive nonsense. And can I just say - Cameron has quit, Farage is out of a job, and apparently there are calls for that monumental prick Juncker to step down, so as far as I'm concerned, that's a pretty good few days.

MyMacMess · 26/06/2016 23:14

I don't agree with all of the points in the op but what you write about immigrants is true. However, I don't think many other Brexit people see eye to eye with you regarding immigration.

Yesterday I spoke to somebody who has come to this country as an asylum seeker from a MENA country when they were quite young. This person and their partner have done very well indeed for themselves and now live comfortable middle class lives with significant financial and other assets. This couple has voted leave because of European immigration. They say the country is full and unable to cope with any more eastern Europeans coming in. They are rather good friends and have shown absolutely no understanding or sympathy to the fact that my family and I now face an uncertain future, without citizenship after having spent all our adult lives in the United Kingdom. This person said they assumed that people immigrants like us would not be affected but when we explained that we have at this pint in time no reassurances they just didn't seem to care very much. Probably coming from MENA they have no particular affinity to Europe or the EU yet they probably have benefitted massively form the employment rights and other EU benefits.

What I'm saying is that for this person immigration was the only issue and they say they are not racist, having been subjected to racism themselves due to coming from a MENA country.

I am convinced that for a large number of Brexit voters European migrants, especially from Easter Europe, are one of the top emotive reason to have voted out.

Believeitornot · 26/06/2016 23:15

I think my issue with the leave voters is that no plan was presented. None at all for how we would exit the EU.
A bit like voting for a party which has an overall vision but no underlying manifesto to support it.
That's why the campaign became so corrosive - it was based on flimsy conjecture.

We've made a momentous decision based on a referendum with 1.3million votes in it. We didn't have a minimum bar for the referendum - it could have been a difference of 100,000 and still we'd be leaving the EU 😱

That's horrific in my view.

Swipe left for the next trending thread