Mathanxiety, education is not, though, about delivering on-message ways to think, about anything! The whole ppint of education, surely, is larning to grow up an appreciate a range of opinions and experiences.
My own personal current 'deal with things in an age appropriate way' is around sex, abortion and rape. DS, 9, has not asked the obvious q's about how conception happens, so i deliberately found a time to sit down and tell him how the sperm gets to the egg. Because I wanted him to hear an accurate version fom me, and also for him to get the idea that it is a perfectly Ok thing to chat about with your Mum. The Evening Standard 'read all about it' boards in the street every day OFTEN have the word 'rape', the word 'abortion' crops up in public print - I am unwilling fo DS to deal with these things before he has even begun to comprehend what happy loving sex with happy consequences might be.
But I suppose most people just feel that the idea of a loving relationship (no mention of sex, no teacher would refer to their sexual activity, surely!) between people of the same sex is no more difficult or shocking than any other kind of loving relationship.
Children deal with new and unfamiliar concepts several times a day - that's the point of being a child - and i have NEVER come across a child who has been shocked or disturbed by discovering that another child has 2 mummies (we had a a 2 mummy family in our post-natal group - has never been an issue for children who have met them at a later age at b'day parties, fro e.g)
DP, why is it that you feel that sam sex relationships are harder for children to deal with than anything else unfamiliar, and need special prep? Two people love each other seems so much less likely to shock than, say, this sausage comes from a dead animal! Or that cemetry is full of dead people, or babies come out of mummies.
I am genuinely trying to understand what it is that, for you, makes same sex relationships 'charged' with this extra factor...but you haven't explained it.If it WAS Leviticus, then i could understand. I wouldn't agree, of course, but it would be a position that you have adopted and can explain. But you haven't.