thecaty not sure if you're saying: 'spineless scare-mongering', can you clarify? It could be a reference to 'spin'.
The ideas described in that unusually honest article by Eugene Shwartz explain the unique pedagogy of the Steiner (Waldorf) kindergarten. It is this pedagogy that is the process: if you don't understand it, thecaty I suggest a little reading. I understand it myself a great deal better than I did when my own children were at a Steiner kindergarten. If the staff had been more honest with us at the time we would have been alarmed, not because they were unkind to our children (they were not) but because there is clearly a potential for exactly the consequences described by posters here and across the web when teachers believe in 'incarnation', spirit worlds and other uberwoo. However well-meaning the teachers, however little they as individuals believe this twaddle, the pedagogy itself is manifest in every aspect of the kindergarten. Having experienced other early years settings just as 'child-centred', welcoming, home-like etc but without the anthroposophy, I believe it just isn't worth the risk of ignoring the Steiner pedagogy and hoping for the best.
A potential for damage is not of course universal damage and many of us feel we've somehow survived our education, it isn't exclusive to any one system. If your friends are interested in how the Steiner pedagogy can manifest negatively they could read the stories on these threads and elsewhere on the web, none of which I can be credited with imagining.
shockers you're right, I'm quoting you: "seductively scary stories"... why would people do that? Most parents are too busy and too concerned with their children's welfare to spend time concocting stories about thriving, happy schools.'
When teachers themselves publicly discredit and belittle parents' experiences as 'OTT' or 'scaremongering' or reply to them with personal insults, it's not surprising that initial poster asked the question 'where can we go to talk about this?'