Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Education

Join the discussion on our Education forum.

Whitehall “braced for private schools collapse” 6

1000 replies

ICouldBeVioletSky · 19/05/2025 11:18

Continuation of previous threads to discuss VAT on independent school fees.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
26
EasternStandard · 16/06/2025 20:35

Walkaround · 16/06/2025 20:33

Not like other taxes. The government collects tax into a big pot, it doesn’t actually collect tax for specific things and only use that tax money for those things. However, it would have to if people were paying for a specific service that others had opted out of. Even National Insurance is spent god-knows-where. If people can opt out of paying towards education, you’ll soon find people demanding to opt out of pretty much everything else, claiming they want to live off-grid and don’t believe in society…

Labour already do this ie collect tax under the pledge it’ll be used for something. Did you see the VAT would be used for 6,500 extra teachers?

Like that but get it from wealthy state school users instead. People seem keen on here and have the funds so why not

Walkaround · 16/06/2025 20:36

EasternStandard · 16/06/2025 20:26

It’s not. It’s just an extra tax. It goes to the gov who allocates.

Like they do with other taxes.

Is this your newly invented fees-tax(fees), where people can choose to pay directly for a service?

Walkaround · 16/06/2025 20:36

EasternStandard · 16/06/2025 20:35

Labour already do this ie collect tax under the pledge it’ll be used for something. Did you see the VAT would be used for 6,500 extra teachers?

Like that but get it from wealthy state school users instead. People seem keen on here and have the funds so why not

That wasn’t a binding pledge, that was like the comments on the side of a bus.

EasternStandard · 16/06/2025 20:37

Walkaround · 16/06/2025 20:36

That wasn’t a binding pledge, that was like the comments on the side of a bus.

Then do the same. Just switch the payer.

Walkaround · 16/06/2025 20:38

EasternStandard · 16/06/2025 20:37

Then do the same. Just switch the payer.

No need to - the majority of voters like it this way round.

strawberrybubblegum · 16/06/2025 20:40

Walkaround · 16/06/2025 19:59

Fairly obviously because when people pay directly for something, they then demand more of a say, which goes against democratic principles. Everyone’s vote is equal in a democratic society.

Actually, this kind of means-tested state-education tax would pretty similar to having student fees paid with a loan and the repayments linked to later earnings. I know student loan repayments aren't strictly a tax, but it does behave the same way.

I'm fairly appalled at the idea of charging - even through a means-tested tax - for compulsory age education. But proponents of this policy are doing exactly that to us - not just hypothetically - so this is just a taste of their own medicine.

And then all these people who say they would gladly pay more tax for better education whilst actually just demanding that other people do could do just that.

EasternStandard · 16/06/2025 20:40

Walkaround · 16/06/2025 20:38

No need to - the majority of voters like it this way round.

So no reasons, and you tried many!

It comes down to I don’t want to pay others should, which is what I said at the start.

Not that socially minded just wanting tax for others.

Walkaround · 16/06/2025 20:45

strawberrybubblegum · 16/06/2025 20:40

Actually, this kind of means-tested state-education tax would pretty similar to having student fees paid with a loan and the repayments linked to later earnings. I know student loan repayments aren't strictly a tax, but it does behave the same way.

I'm fairly appalled at the idea of charging - even through a means-tested tax - for compulsory age education. But proponents of this policy are doing exactly that to us - not just hypothetically - so this is just a taste of their own medicine.

And then all these people who say they would gladly pay more tax for better education whilst actually just demanding that other people do could do just that.

They could do just that in many other ways that don’t inevitably result in those who are paying more in education taxes insisting that they get more rights than other voters to decide what state education should look like - ie effectively turning state education into private education (complete with all those academies already set up… almost like it was planned).

Walkaround · 16/06/2025 20:47

There’s no point pretending it’s just spite that makes some people more communally minded and others more intensely individualistic.

EasternStandard · 16/06/2025 20:51

Walkaround · 16/06/2025 20:47

There’s no point pretending it’s just spite that makes some people more communally minded and others more intensely individualistic.

No idea what this is referring to but if you want to pay more and use state, plus can afford it you can be more community minded. That’s what I’m suggesting.

Or communally if you want that too.

Walkaround · 16/06/2025 20:53

EasternStandard · 16/06/2025 20:40

So no reasons, and you tried many!

It comes down to I don’t want to pay others should, which is what I said at the start.

Not that socially minded just wanting tax for others.

Tax on a private service that adds value - recognised concept, just somewhat controversial when the service is education, but that’s been dealt with in a court case. Tax on a service paid for out of tax - a bit weird.

Walkaround · 16/06/2025 20:54

EasternStandard · 16/06/2025 20:40

So no reasons, and you tried many!

It comes down to I don’t want to pay others should, which is what I said at the start.

Not that socially minded just wanting tax for others.

Tax on a private service that adds value - recognised concept, just somewhat controversial when the service is education, but that’s been dealt with in a court case. Tax on a service paid for out of tax - a bit weird.

EasternStandard · 16/06/2025 20:56

Walkaround · 16/06/2025 20:54

Tax on a private service that adds value - recognised concept, just somewhat controversial when the service is education, but that’s been dealt with in a court case. Tax on a service paid for out of tax - a bit weird.

Or people post a lot about others paying and how important it is but even if they have the funds won’t want to. No chance by the sounds of it.

Walkaround · 16/06/2025 20:57

EasternStandard · 16/06/2025 20:51

No idea what this is referring to but if you want to pay more and use state, plus can afford it you can be more community minded. That’s what I’m suggesting.

Or communally if you want that too.

Edited

Funnily enough, this already happens. If your children are forced into the state sector, you will see there is already a nice little line going in voluntary parental donations… all VAT free, of course.

EasternStandard · 16/06/2025 21:00

Walkaround · 16/06/2025 20:57

Funnily enough, this already happens. If your children are forced into the state sector, you will see there is already a nice little line going in voluntary parental donations… all VAT free, of course.

Ok great so extend that out and you’ve got a good earner.

My dc are in state they won’t be forced anywhere. It’s still a woeful policy from Labour.

And those who claim to be communally minded are asking others to pay not offering it instead.

Walkaround · 16/06/2025 21:04

EasternStandard · 16/06/2025 21:00

Ok great so extend that out and you’ve got a good earner.

My dc are in state they won’t be forced anywhere. It’s still a woeful policy from Labour.

And those who claim to be communally minded are asking others to pay not offering it instead.

Those who are communally minded accept democracy, even when they don’t agree with it.

KendricksGin · 16/06/2025 21:05

Walkaround · 16/06/2025 20:53

Tax on a private service that adds value - recognised concept, just somewhat controversial when the service is education, but that’s been dealt with in a court case. Tax on a service paid for out of tax - a bit weird.

More than weird. Totally crazy. This thread gets ever more fanciful. Is it the outcome of the courts blocking off options so thinking has to get ever more magical?

EasternStandard · 16/06/2025 21:06

Walkaround · 16/06/2025 21:04

Those who are communally minded accept democracy, even when they don’t agree with it.

Did you ever post criticism of the last gov when they were in? I’m guessing not going by your post.

And if someone else gets in at next GE you’ll say nowt.

EasternStandard · 16/06/2025 21:07

KendricksGin · 16/06/2025 21:05

More than weird. Totally crazy. This thread gets ever more fanciful. Is it the outcome of the courts blocking off options so thinking has to get ever more magical?

It’s interesting to see how strongly people are against but for others paying.

Especially when they’ve posted re wealth.

EasternStandard · 16/06/2025 21:08

Just wondering how socially minded people really are…

Or just posting they definitely are.

strawberrybubblegum · 16/06/2025 21:09

Walkaround · 16/06/2025 20:47

There’s no point pretending it’s just spite that makes some people more communally minded and others more intensely individualistic.

Sometimes it's being communally minded, and sometimes it's just spite.

Communally minded also doesn't always result in the best outcome for the community. Communism is proof of that.

EasternStandard · 16/06/2025 21:10

Nothing to do with the court case incidentally.

On all these threads pro VAT have never offered to pay.

KendricksGin · 16/06/2025 21:13

EasternStandard · 16/06/2025 21:07

It’s interesting to see how strongly people are against but for others paying.

Especially when they’ve posted re wealth.

Edited

I'm fine to pay a higher level of income tax along with everyone else in my tax band despite the fact I pay an awful lot already. I would not be happy with any specific taxes being levied on state education in principle. There is a clue in the label.

KendricksGin · 16/06/2025 21:14

strawberrybubblegum · 16/06/2025 21:09

Sometimes it's being communally minded, and sometimes it's just spite.

Communally minded also doesn't always result in the best outcome for the community. Communism is proof of that.

There are different flavours of being community minded. It doesn't have to be the extreme of communism.

KendricksGin · 16/06/2025 21:15

EasternStandard · 16/06/2025 21:10

Nothing to do with the court case incidentally.

On all these threads pro VAT have never offered to pay.

That old chestnut, why don't people volunteer to pay more taxes on an individual basis? Not gonna happen and naive in the extreme to think it will. People will pay the taxes that are imposed on them. That's how it works.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.