Re the 13+ entry. We all sit the same 11+ exam at 10/11, the difference is that rather than entry at year 7 you get a conditional offer for entry in year 9 (i.e. passing Common entrance at the required %).
It does seem harder for those going for 13+, as you sit the same exams and there are less places. Instead of an interview if you are borderline, you either get outright rejection (friends have already despite some boys being very bright) or you get come back and try again next year and sit 12+ exams... for entry at 13.
I suspect because DS did not finish the maths paper, we are borderline despite strong English/VR and normally very strong maths... but it is one multi choice exam for x minutes at the end of one very full day for a 10 year old boy......anything can happen. So because they don't interview for this for 13 entry.... I am expecting come back and do more tests at 12+ as we have not heard yet.
If that happens, then I am not sure we would go for that regardless of the schools kudos/academics/position in league tables as I wouldn't want the uncertainty or to put my young DS through more exams, followed by Common Entrance too. He is just starting his academic journey... why try and burn them out so young?
No school is worth that when there are more pastoral but growing in academic schools close by for us that DS has offers for. In hindsight, I wish we had gone for year 7 entry.. but then my bright DS is very very young in the year, so we chose 13+ entry for pastoral reasons.
Right school, right boy. However, as a result of the nature of this process compared to other schools, I am increasingly wondering if RGS is right for us, despite the 'draw' of the final academic results/league tables with an academic but also very sporty and young in the year DS.