Crikey - this is some thread! I thought the "exempt people aren't really exempt and just need to try a bit harder" thinking had disappeared around last summer. Apparently not. I assume that anyone who can't "just try for a little bit over the mouth" haven't been seeking treatment for whatever it is they need treatment for. Which is one way of cutting down patient numbers I suppose
. Quite like the "well, x other country doesn't have mask exemptions, and you don't see maskless people there" argument
(well, no, because they can't leave their house, so of course you won't see them!)
OP - I agree that the possibility of masks til next year is really daunting. I haven't been as affected by them as you
- I can, and do wear a mask when required, and will continue to do so. Because, as you say, it is the law. I'm not exempt, and I don't want to break the law by choosing not to wear a mask, even though it's impossible to prove one way or another. I understand I wouldn't be fined or anything, as long as I didn't kick up a fuss in front of a policeman about "my rights" or whatever. I may even continue to wear a mask in some situations if it wasn't mandatory - if it was really crowded, or I knew there were vulnerable people around, or if someone asked me to - because, hey, I'm not a dick.
But I really dislike masks, on me and on other people (mainly a hearing thing). So I'm choosing to do fewer things that I would otherwise like to do, because they involve masks. I know it's very uncool for Edinburgh locals to enjoy the Fringe, but I do, and I'd have liked to have gone to a few indoor shows this year - but all the restrictions (not just masks) make it sound pretty joyless, so I'll give it a miss. That's entirely my decision, and no one is suffering apart from me. It's a bit shit, and I'm not spending money that I would like to spend in businesses that might like me to spend it with them - but that's my decision, and I'm hardly causing the local economy to collapse by myself. Meh.
I assume Scotland is keeping the mandatory masks and things like keeping customer details in hospitality just as a "doorstop" regulation - so if there is a requirement to bring back further restrictions in the winter they already have the legislation in place to add to. But it doesn't really seem proportionate any more in my opinion. If, as NS says, no one she speaks to really minds wearing masks, then people will wear them regardless, so no law is needed. If she isn't right, and actually about half of the people in a supermarket aren't wearing masks just because they don't want to, as suggested on this thread, then having it in law isn't making any difference anyway, so why not make it voluntary?
I'm also not keen on the framing of any questioning of when it's all going to end as "uncaring" and "selfish" - as "its important to protect the NHS/ the vulnerable/ the unvaccinated/ children/ everyone else as you can still get long covid even if vaccinated..." It's a perfectly reasonable question, in my opinion! We're not nasty people for asking when things could possibly go back to normal normal - especially as we're currently following the law as it stands. Unless the law is now we all need to love masks, and be grateful we have the chance to wear them...