We can't completely get rid of the risks, no, (thanks to countries like the UK) but we can reduce them. Huh? Did I miss something? Do you mean that as the UK can no more eradicate the virus than any other country, that those countries are responsible for the virus continuing to exist?
I think you, and many others, missed the meaning in almost eveything that was said. As many here explained last night.
Now is the time that the balance between doing what we can to stop the virus spreading and not being able to do more, without staying in lockdown for another extended period has been reached.
People, CEV and otherwise, will die. I am CEV so please don't shout that I am an uncaring bitch. The choices being made now, the data analysis and discussions across the scientific community, are focussed on opening up at the best time, NOT to prevent those inevitable death, but so as not to overwhelm the NHS (yes, that old chestnut) and not to make the situation worse by opening in winter.
Yes, they REALLY did say that people WILL DIE and that they are no longer trying to prevent those deaths as we are at that point where those people, CEV, vaccinated or not, would die of covid (or maybe flu etc) as soon as we do open up. So they are trying to find the best time to let that happen without causing more lockdowns.
It's shit, but that's what pandemics do.