I have just read the BBC article.
What I see is a man mostly claiming his opinion as truth with no supporting evidence or additional witnesses.
One example:
"Tens of thousands of people died, who didn't need to die," Mr Cummings added.
Fucking hell! Seriously?
He has the qualifications and knowledge to ascertain this when top scientists and doctors in the field would not dare to put their reputations and careers on the line by categorically stating such?
Sure, there are a few media hungry ones in love with the sound of their own voices who would but not ones with any scientific integrity because these things cannot be known, they can only be theorised.
They might think it, they might have some data that is supportive but most would err on the side of caution and would not state their opinion as fact.
Scientists favourite phrases include:
We just don't know.
Cannot be proven.
Results are inconclusive.
Dominic Cummings should share his method of reaching certainty where none exists with the scientific community.
"Cos I say so" doesn't quite cut it.