I should imagine there’s a difference between mixing and matching during the initial vaccination process - ie 2 jabs to be fully vaccinated - and doing boosters for variants in future. If you mix and match in the first stage, they don’t know how that affects levels of immunity, or side effects. Once you have the immunity expected from the jabs you were given in order to be fully immunised first off, boosters are a different matter. Scientists have already been saying that it will be impossible to ensure you get the same company’s jab for the booster as for the initial vaccination, anyway.
It’s not as if anyone ever insists on the same company’s flu vaccine every year (or I certainly don’t!) - what you are given depends on availability, your age, allergies, and possibly other conditions too. To insist on not completing your course of treatment for something, but instead having half of another course of treatment, instead, is highly unorthodox and certainly shouldn’t be opted for by people not willing to take the risk of doing what has been prescribed for them in the first place, as these are clearly not people happy with risking the unknown.