@AStudyinPink
But we do require people to have certain vaccines (with very specific and narrow spectrum of exemptions) to do certain jobs already. I am required to have certain vaccines in order to be employed by the NHS (not related to covid). And would need the same for the vast, vast number of reputable private healthcare providers. This is not for my protection, it for the protection of patients. Is this an infringement of my rights? I don’t think it is. I could have refused to have the vaccinations required. But the consequence would be I could not be employed by most potential employers due to my choice. I have autonomy, but I must also bear the consequences of wielding that autonomy in a way which is in conflict with the requirements of employers and wider society.
I would argue carers of vulnerable people (whether due to age, health problems or disability) whether in a care/residential setting or caring for people in their own homes, also have a responsibility to those they care for. They should have a vaccine- unless they have a medical exemption, of course. This could apply to many roles. You can chose not to, but may need to seek alternative employment.
If you chose not to have a vaccine, some businesses (airlines, hotels/b&b’s) may refuse your business. Because you are likely to pose a higher risk than an unvaccinated person (neither are zero risk) and could, for example, require them to shut their business if you were later to test positive. Some countries may not wish you to visit as you pose a higher risk than a vaccinated individual. It’s not an infringement of your rights for others- whether that is an individual, organisation/business or country- to decide that the risk you pose as a result of your choice not to be vaccinated means they do not want your custom/business/ visit/ services or to work for them. Obviously, universal things like healthcare are a different matter.