@BentBastard
Maybe I have misunderstood what is meant by "showing the reality inside ICU wards" but I think it is putting patients first by not filming them under such circumstances when they are no position to give consent.
But like I say, perhaps I have misunderstood.
"to try and warn the public to stay home, keep their distance, believe the gravity of the situation."
So I should think consent from patients and families would routinely be requested as far as patients are involved.
But it sounds as though there is an attempt to control social media comms from a high level, and not just letting cameras in. (It also sounds as though there are a few doctors who are persevering in writing and talking about what is happening anyway).
That has become more of a thing in recent years. But is a concern if people don't have a clear idea of the severity of the pandemic.
In yesterday's Indie Sage broadcast, a junior doctor, just off night shift, was talking about struggles to support patients who need the most intensive O2 and CPAP input, and switching patients between devices (because they don't have enough). She said this is not how you'd expect to practise medicine in the UK.
Another doctor said that they need contingency planning for when they can't deliver the care that they would normally - there are a lot of ethical dilemmas for them, (a real challenge when they are physically and emotionally exhausted, may not have been able to take leave for extended periods etc).
Indie Sage item from yesterday