@F1ftyF1fty
Some NHS staff are at less risk then many teachers and support staff.
Yes, but NHS staff mostly have the vaccine to protect those they work with (the vulnerable, mostly), in the hope that it reduces the chance of them passing it on to them (not proved but likely enough and the same reason we have the flu vaccines given to HCPs) and also possibly because it would reduce the number of staff being off isolating or ill (which means those vulnerable people get better/faster treatment).
Population vaccination is done on population level risks, not individuals.
While vaccinating teachers would protect them individually, plus also keeping schools open due to not having lots of staff off isolating. These are good things, but neither directly reduce the burden on the NHS or number of vulnerable people getting ill (it would, indirectly, due to reduced transmission, but not as significantly).
There's a reason the JCVI chose the priority list we have. Other countries, however, have included teachers in their earlier priority schedules (Russia, at least have I believe) so it would be interesting to compare the rationales.
I don't disagree that vaccinating teachers would be helpful, but more in a 'keep society functioning' way rather than a 'reducing hospital admissions' way.
As a HCP, I will be getting mine this week. If it were just to protect me I'd rather not have it (or the flu vaccine I have every year) as I am low risk and other people are further down the list than me who would likely be in greater need as individuals. But me having it protects the people I work with, both by me being (hopefully) less likely to give them covid and also by me being there rather than off sick with it.