A systematic review and meta-analysis of published research data on COVID-19 infection-fatality rates
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.03.20089854v4
"Based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of published evidence on COVID-19 until May, 2020,
the IFR of the disease across populations is 0.68% (0.53-0.82%).
< medical advances since May have likely lowered this somewhat >
However, due to very high heterogeneity in the meta-analysis, it is difficult to know if this represents the true point estimate.
It is likely that, due to age and perhaps underlying comorbidities in the population, different places will experience different IFRs due to the disease
< Looking at the evidence has indicated this for some time, as has population density, health services, deprivation etc
The Uni Bonn Gangelt study suggested as low as 0.36% for Germany >
Given issues with mortality recording,
it is also likely that this represents an underestimate of the true IFR figure.
More research looking at age-stratified IFR is urgently needed to inform policy-making on this front."
< Age is absolutely dominant, hence we need to consider IFR in the 65+ cohort, among whom the vast majority of feaths occur, alongside the general population IFR for a country or group of similar countries >