@Jrobhatch29
I've no need to argue with you so let's not, I think I've made my point that both the speed and tone of the replies any time this poster posts seem distinctive.
I found this in the Science article interesting:
In a review paper published 19 May in Acta Paediatrica, Ludvigsson concluded that children are “unlikely to be the main drivers” of COVID-19 spread. He cited case studies from France and Australia but wrote that, “So far there have been no reports of COVID-19 outbreaks in Swedish schools,” citing “personal communication” from Anders Tegnell, Sweden’s state epidemiologist, on 12 May. “This supports the argument that asymptomatic children attending schools are unlikely to spread the disease,” Ludvigsson wrote.
However, a scan of Swedish newspapers makes clear that school outbreaks have occurred. In the town of Skellefteå, a teacher died and 18 of 76 staff tested positive at a school with about 500 students in preschool through ninth grade. The school closed for 2 weeks because so many staff were sick, but students were not tested for the virus. In Uppsala, staff protested when school officials, citing patient privacy rules, declined to notify families or staff that a teacher had tested positive. No contact tracing was done at the school. At least two staff members at other schools have died, but those schools remained open and no one attempted to trace the spread of the disease there.
You can not find out much about the things you don't study. This approach is sometimes taken by governments - it is why poverty targets in the UK were dropped, so we no longer collect that data.
As ever, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. We've made so many errors in the UK with covid so far, it'd be good to avoid more where we can.