There are lots of children and adults whose lives will be severely affected by this for a long time to come.
But it's not going to be a case of 'those that were allowed to break the rules and play in the paddling pool with their friends will be ok but those who had to stay 2m apart will not.
It will be those who had to stay in tiny flats with no stimulation (and, in the case of some older children, no company at all) all day, those who lost family members to either Covid or something else that couldn't be dealt with properly due to it, those who witnessed violence, conflict and emotional distress, those who went hungry and those who had their safety nets pulled from them and were left adrift.
A few parents of those children might be on this site. But, by and large, the children of mumsnetters will be ok. Putting the health and safety of the country as a whole ahead of the safety of our individual children is not going to hurt most of our children long term. They would have more fun if they could play unrestrained, for sure. But it's not going to scar most of them to stick by the restrictions we're currently under.
There are probably some children of parents on here who are exceptions due to a range of circumstances and needs and who do need to be 'allowed' to break the rules. But it isn't going to be the majority.
I have no proof of this but I think the 'average' mumsnetter has
- a garden or nearby public park
- enough money to feed and shelter their children
- both the will and the means to stimulate and entertain their child 4) the social contacts to enable them to see and interact with other children.
- a strong enough relationship and connection to their child to make them feel loved and secure, despite lockdown.
I know that won't apply to everyone. That's why blanket rules always have exceptions.