Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Covid

Mumsnet doesn't verify the qualifications of users. If you have medical concerns, please consult a healthcare professional.

Would you be happy to lock down for the next two years?

612 replies

BirdieFriendReturns · 13/05/2020 12:01

If the government restrictions stayed in place?

So until May 2022.

OP posts:
BeforeIPutOnMyMakeup · 13/05/2020 12:27

Oh and I'm one of the few who has worked from home a lot for over a decade.

BirdieFriendReturns · 13/05/2020 12:27

People saying they would comply - how long would you comply for?

OP posts:
squiglet111 · 13/05/2020 12:28

No chance the economy could survive that long. Money has got to come from somewhere to pay bills, government can't furlough for that long

Spacemonkey2016 · 13/05/2020 12:29

Not a chance. My children would suffer too much. My DD would be 2 and wouldn't have met anyone but her parents and brother!

Shadeslayer · 13/05/2020 12:29

No we would end up in lots of debt it would sink us.

Pedagoogle · 13/05/2020 12:29

This is the new normal. We need to get to get our head round the idea that this isn’t “lockdown” this is normal life now.

Eeyoresstickhouse · 13/05/2020 12:31

No, I would not. That is not living it is existing. I would take my chances on the virus while having fun. People should have severe mental health issues with lockdown for 2 years.

VaggieMight · 13/05/2020 12:31

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at poster's request.

BirdieFriendReturns · 13/05/2020 12:31

Pedagoogle - how long do you think we’ll be social distancing for?

OP posts:
Biscuit0110 · 13/05/2020 12:33

No of course not!!!

Nameofchanges · 13/05/2020 12:33

We won’t stay in lockdown and I don’t think we should. But I think the priority should be for those who are at low risk for getting seriously ill to be sent back first, and I am disturbed the government has not taken this approach.

I would also like to see some more sensible plans than return to the previous economy. Much of the economy was already precarious; there were too many restaurants that were in trouble before this began.

If people are being told that public transport is a danger then they need to invest in safe cycling routes so that more people can safely get to work.

YetAnotherSpartacus · 13/05/2020 12:34

I wouldn't be happy, but if the evidence showed that it would save lives and could be sustainable then I'd say 'yes' - although I know I'd never see my Mum again. :(

usernotfound0000 · 13/05/2020 12:34

No. There would be more risk from a prolonged lockdown than there would be from the virus.

timeforawine · 13/05/2020 12:34

Not a chance

bluebeck · 13/05/2020 12:35

Yes.

CeibaTree · 13/05/2020 12:35

No way, the cure cannot be worse than the disease. At some point there has to be a decision to get on with life and we will all just have to take our chances. It is a tragedy that the government have failed us so badly and 40,000 people have died, but the UK population is around 67m people, so the percentage of people who have died or even been infected is tiny. I know this is no consolation for the affected families though.

Iwalkinmyclothing · 13/05/2020 12:35

No. The scale of suffering caused by such a lockdown would make c19 deaths look like a stubbed toe.

binkyboinky · 13/05/2020 12:36

No, definitely not. My mum is isolated and on her own and she is feeling very depressed and lonely. I call/video her every day but I don't think she would last 2 years. It's just a disease, there are so many around! We will just have to live with the risks and get on with our lives. Hong Kong is going back to normal, except that everyone there has to wear a mask everywhere, and there are precautions and temperature checks in shops and restaurants. We need to just do that too.

I'm feeling isolated too, on furlough, and in danger of losing my job. Not all of us have big families, children, pets and gardens to keep us occupied. It's hellish for some of us.

Why doesn't the government make wearing masks outside mandatory?? That would be common sense. Then at least we'll help slow the rate of infection while going back to a semi-normal life. All these prats not wearing masks outside piss me off.

IndiaMay · 13/05/2020 12:36

FFS this will never happen, for one thing the NHS is funded by peoples taxes. If bo ones earning money we're hardly protecting it are we? I'm also baffled why people are so terrified to die. I get if you have children then you need to be here for them but I'm part of a young childless couple, if I'm going to die of Corona then that's that. No point living a half life for years on end

Alsohuman · 13/05/2020 12:36

No fucking way. Living isn’t just not being dead.

Itis6oclocksomewhere · 13/05/2020 12:37

Absolutely not. I'm struggling now.

dairyfairies · 13/05/2020 12:37

this won't happen and I doubt many would be doing this. It already has a huge impact on us by not accessing school (one of the DC is severely disabled and the other DC's mental health has taken a huge knock by not being able to see friends). We are totally isolated (no friends or other family either). we won't be able to do this much longer.

I am much more worried about the long-term effect of the lockdown on us (esp the DC) than I am scared of catching Corona. There gotta be a balance.

mynameiscalypso · 13/05/2020 12:38

If people want to live in lockdown forever, that's their prerogative. I'd rather learn to live with the virus as we've learnt to live with all sorts of other viruses and illnesses.

Teateaandmoretea · 13/05/2020 12:38

Absolutely not.

TP67 · 13/05/2020 12:38

No

Swipe left for the next trending thread