@housemdwaswrong
What I am saying is that there has to be a balance between protecting the vulnerable and the effects that a lockdown has on the economy, on mental heath and on society.
Clearly, we don't want a situation where we have large numbers of older and vulnerable people dying. However, we have to get to a position where these groups are shielded at home for 3-6 months and everyone else is able to resume life.
We cannot have a situation where this lockdown goes on for 6 months, as that will set the economy back 20 years, and cause more deaths from depression and job losses.
As my 81 year old DM puts it, it is not fair for the youngsters today to have their lives destroyed to extend those of the elderly. Yes, I am aware that there are younger victims- but the average age of deaths in Italy is 79.5.