So I spent the afternoon dealing with business related matters and have now RTFT and am keeping half an eye on Sky News Live.
What I am baffled by is the "meh, tracking the numbers ain't really important" message. FFS everything that happens in the world now is governed by data and algorithms. In our technological age, this is our great advantage. It informs everything from disease spread to what brand of toothpaste we buy. In this situation tight observation and recording is surely vital, from tracking source of infection to the symptoms to the rate of transmission to duration of disease including risks of co morbidity. All of these things are essential to formulate our collective response and minimise deaths and suffering, plus to manage the likely economic effects. As I have said before, these things are all inextricably intertwined. If we have the technology to explore space, monitor seismic activity and predict social trends and by extension manipulate them, then why TF aren't all these resources being funnelled into what is being described as the greatest public health crisis in decades?
I just don't get it. Yes the NHS is under pressure but how difficult can it be to implement community testing to give a clear picture of transmission. If it's down to a quick finger prick test being sent to be tested at a designated lab, then stations could have been set up weeks ago and labs set up - I really don't buy the idea that we are so far behind the capabilites of China that this could not have been done.
Yes, we may ALL have it to some degree - it is the risk of transmission to high risk groups that is the concern, and if asymptomatic people are the highest pathogen shedders then this should be factored in.
Informed choices cannot be made if information is not gathered, is not gathered or recorded effectively or is actively suppressed.
Elections are manipulated and swung by data - why can't the spread of a virus?