Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East

Missing US crew member rescued in 'daring' operation in Iran

177 replies

Twiglets1 · 05/04/2026 06:41

A missing U.S. service member who was shot down in Iran has been rescued following a risky mission deep behind enemy lines in mountainous terrain, Donald Trump has announced.

“WE GOT HIM!” the president posted on Truth Social shortly after midnight on Saturday. “My fellow Americans, over the past several hours, the United States Military pulled off one of the most daring Search and Rescue Operations in U.S. History.”

Iranian authorities had offered a bounty to anyone who handed over the missing airman alive, a state television anchor announced previously. White House officials had remained largely silent on the search.

Trump said that the unnamed airman had sustained injuries during the crash but “will be just fine.”

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-iran-pilot-rescue-b2952011.html

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
Never2many · 05/04/2026 13:34

We’re assuming of course that he was actually lost out there and not planted there and then rescued in order to bring about a daring rescue to make trump and his ilk look the heroes.

Emilesgran · 05/04/2026 13:36

Never2many · 05/04/2026 13:34

We’re assuming of course that he was actually lost out there and not planted there and then rescued in order to bring about a daring rescue to make trump and his ilk look the heroes.

OMG 🙄

getthewetdogoffthesofa · 05/04/2026 13:53

@notimagainDo mind me asking, I’m curious about the crew member, IYKYK bit. Can I ask what that means/why it’s significant? Thanks

notimagain · 05/04/2026 13:59

getthewetdogoffthesofa · 05/04/2026 13:53

@notimagainDo mind me asking, I’m curious about the crew member, IYKYK bit. Can I ask what that means/why it’s significant? Thanks

I regretted posting that not long after I did it.

It was an expression of thanks/relief that at least some posters knew enough to not think in terms of there being two pilots, because there weren't, it was one pilot and one weapons systems operator....

Nothing more mysterious than that.

getthewetdogoffthesofa · 05/04/2026 14:05

@notimagainAh thanks for explaining. I was genuinely just a bit curious. Can’t see any reason to regret an innocent comment, I can see why you made it now, seems completely reasonable :)

KatiePricesKnickers · 05/04/2026 14:08

Never2many · 05/04/2026 13:34

We’re assuming of course that he was actually lost out there and not planted there and then rescued in order to bring about a daring rescue to make trump and his ilk look the heroes.

Unbelievable someone would even think this, let alone post it.
Amazing!

FloralDeerPattern · 05/04/2026 14:13

Everybodys · 05/04/2026 13:17

It isn't.

This is a thread about a rescue that looks to have involved at minimum looking the other way by the locals. That makes the behaviour of the Iranian regime actually very relevant- a good chunk of their people utterly despise them, what with them doing shit like murdering thousands of protesters. If they didn't behave like that, perhaps the locals would be rather less sympathetic towards foreign fighters in a force that have also killed some Iranian civilians.

It's possible to oppose the war whilst still acknowledging this.

No it really doesn't. This war has done nothing to allow Iranians to protest, it's done nothing to free them from the regime, it's done nothing to make them safer, it's done nothing to install democracy.

If the US and Israel didn't behave like war mongering, blood thirsty dickheads then that man wouldnt have been there to cause death and destruction in the first place and wouldn't have needed rescuing from the situation that the US and Israel created. If they didn't behave like that the world wouldn't be heading for economic catastrophe and Iranians would be in the same position as they are now ie still living under an awful regime but with less people dead, injured and displaced from bombings.

Everybodys · 05/04/2026 14:18

FloralDeerPattern · 05/04/2026 14:13

No it really doesn't. This war has done nothing to allow Iranians to protest, it's done nothing to free them from the regime, it's done nothing to make them safer, it's done nothing to install democracy.

If the US and Israel didn't behave like war mongering, blood thirsty dickheads then that man wouldnt have been there to cause death and destruction in the first place and wouldn't have needed rescuing from the situation that the US and Israel created. If they didn't behave like that the world wouldn't be heading for economic catastrophe and Iranians would be in the same position as they are now ie still living under an awful regime but with less people dead, injured and displaced from bombings.

Yes, it really does.

Again, this isn't a pro or anti war point. I agree that the war has not made Iranians any more free as things stand, and it may not. But the protesting point is relevant because the regime behaviour is a reason why the locals stood by or actively assisted, despite the US also killing some of them. It just is. You aren't getting round that one. Revealed preference.

Fredflinstoneswife1 · 05/04/2026 14:41

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

PoppinjayPolly · 05/04/2026 14:52

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

You forgot the sanctimonious bit too!

Emilesgran · 05/04/2026 14:53

FloralDeerPattern · 05/04/2026 14:13

No it really doesn't. This war has done nothing to allow Iranians to protest, it's done nothing to free them from the regime, it's done nothing to make them safer, it's done nothing to install democracy.

If the US and Israel didn't behave like war mongering, blood thirsty dickheads then that man wouldnt have been there to cause death and destruction in the first place and wouldn't have needed rescuing from the situation that the US and Israel created. If they didn't behave like that the world wouldn't be heading for economic catastrophe and Iranians would be in the same position as they are now ie still living under an awful regime but with less people dead, injured and displaced from bombings.

The post you're replying to doesn't say that the war is to allow Iranians to protest etc. In fact you seem to be saying that even if Iranians support this war, they are mistaken, and that you know better than they do.

That's quite colonialist/western supremacist isn't it?

I mean, if you have evidence that they don't support it, that would be different.
But you havent't provided any - just your own opinion.

Whereas I've mentioned a couple of things that seem to suggest that they probably do support it, or at least that they hate the current regime even more and so are willing to put up with the bombing which they feel targets the regime more than the people.

Twiglets1 · 05/04/2026 16:10

FloralDeerPattern · 05/04/2026 10:48

Oh come on the OP choosing to quote 'daring' in her op. Posters making fun of the UK military just like Trump does. And like I said big upping this rescue of a man who was there to cause death and destruction as some great win, rescuing him from the claws of evil. This one man elevated above the innocent people across the Middle East who have been killed and maimed by people just like this man. It's a serious snore fest of pro US propaganda that is harming us all.

It was a daring op in my opinion - wasn’t exactly an easy day at the office was it?

Doesn’t mean I think those that criticise the US are de facto supportive of the Iranian regime as @Boolabus suggested. I’m just glad this airman has been rescued as are most people on this thread.

It’s ok to be positive sometimes! It’s a good thing this individual was rescued regardless of whether people support the US starting the war or not.

OP posts:
Twiglets1 · 05/04/2026 16:17

Boolabus · 05/04/2026 09:51

Why are you slagging off the British forces?

I’m not, I’m very clearly making a weak joke about Starmer.

How you got “slagging off the British forces” from what I said is a mystery seeing as I didn’t mention them, only Starmer.

OP posts:
1dayatatime · 05/04/2026 16:24

Never2many · 05/04/2026 13:34

We’re assuming of course that he was actually lost out there and not planted there and then rescued in order to bring about a daring rescue to make trump and his ilk look the heroes.

Please please please avoid voting in any general elections and stick to just voting on Strictly etc.

shuddacuddadidnt · 05/04/2026 17:00

EasternStandard · 05/04/2026 11:15

Which posters you may as well be upfront with the accusation

Last time I checked, observation ≠ accusation.

FloralDeerPattern · 05/04/2026 18:25

Emilesgran · 05/04/2026 14:53

The post you're replying to doesn't say that the war is to allow Iranians to protest etc. In fact you seem to be saying that even if Iranians support this war, they are mistaken, and that you know better than they do.

That's quite colonialist/western supremacist isn't it?

I mean, if you have evidence that they don't support it, that would be different.
But you havent't provided any - just your own opinion.

Whereas I've mentioned a couple of things that seem to suggest that they probably do support it, or at least that they hate the current regime even more and so are willing to put up with the bombing which they feel targets the regime more than the people.

'They' are 90million people each with their own thoughts and feelings on this. There is no 'they think this' or 'they think that' when it comes to talking about what 90million people think and feel.

Emilesgran · 05/04/2026 18:34

FloralDeerPattern · 05/04/2026 18:25

'They' are 90million people each with their own thoughts and feelings on this. There is no 'they think this' or 'they think that' when it comes to talking about what 90million people think and feel.

That's a weird thing to say when elections and opinion polls are based on asking everyone what they think.

We don't need unanimity on something to say it's popular, or unpopular.

You and I don't live there, so our opinions on whether this war is a good thing for Iran can't replace theirs. As I said before, we don't have a lot of evidence on what Iranians think about it, but what we do have shows that there seems to be a significant degree of support for it. IMO people outside the country should respect that and not pretend to know what's good for Iranians based on their own opinions.

It's perfectly reasonable to be against the war because it's causing petrol prices to shoot up in the UK - but it's not reasonable to say it's because you care about dead Iranians when the Iranian regime has just murdered thousands, possibly tens of thousands, of their own people and when we've seen evidence that a lot of people there actually celebrated when Khamenei was killed.

FloralDeerPattern · 05/04/2026 18:37

Emilesgran · 05/04/2026 18:34

That's a weird thing to say when elections and opinion polls are based on asking everyone what they think.

We don't need unanimity on something to say it's popular, or unpopular.

You and I don't live there, so our opinions on whether this war is a good thing for Iran can't replace theirs. As I said before, we don't have a lot of evidence on what Iranians think about it, but what we do have shows that there seems to be a significant degree of support for it. IMO people outside the country should respect that and not pretend to know what's good for Iranians based on their own opinions.

It's perfectly reasonable to be against the war because it's causing petrol prices to shoot up in the UK - but it's not reasonable to say it's because you care about dead Iranians when the Iranian regime has just murdered thousands, possibly tens of thousands, of their own people and when we've seen evidence that a lot of people there actually celebrated when Khamenei was killed.

Edited

You and I don't live there, so our opinions on whether this war is a good thing for Iran can't replace theirs.

I mean I don't think that we need opinions when we can see with our own eyes that it has changed nothing for Iranians except more death and destruction 🤔

MissConductUS · 05/04/2026 18:39

notimagain · 05/04/2026 08:26

@MyThreeWords

They would probably have made him, in effect, a hostage and a bargaining chip, which is standard practice for prisoners of war in many conflicts. And of course it would be a propaganda point for them.

If the IRGC, which despite everything has something close to disciplne and a chain of command, had got hold of him then maybe.

OTOH if some of the regime associated militia and other hot heads had got to him first then he may not have survived long enough to have been a bargaining chip.

Iran’s regular army (the Artesh), is said to be fairly professional and would likely have treated the WSO properly had they found him.

The Artesh’s mission is to defend Iranian territory. The IRGC defends the regime.

Emilesgran · 05/04/2026 19:03

FloralDeerPattern · 05/04/2026 18:37

You and I don't live there, so our opinions on whether this war is a good thing for Iran can't replace theirs.

I mean I don't think that we need opinions when we can see with our own eyes that it has changed nothing for Iranians except more death and destruction 🤔

Maybe it's too soon to tell though? If you'd lost friends and family murdered (and in many cases raped and tortured first) by the regime, perhaps you'd think that a few weeks of bombing was a price worth paying if it killed some of the people who'd ordered the murder of your family.

So no, you really don't know.

MissConductUS · 05/04/2026 19:21

notimagain · 05/04/2026 07:15

The US (and some other nations) will move heaven and earth to extract downed aircrew so this is all entirely credible, they even have specialist units comprised of personnel trained and equipped for exactly this sort of operation.

I've mentioned this example elsewhere but it's maybe worth mentioning again..

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RogerLocher

P.S. Thanks to @Twiglet1 for using "crewmember"...IYKYK.

Edited

Here’s a good article on USAF SERE training.

https://www.wsj.com/world/how-elite-american-forces-are-trained-to-survive-behind-enemy-lines-1c12c841?st=8JsEYj

DaringDarlingDebbie · 05/04/2026 22:48

It was daring though wasn’t it, and extremely dangerous. Imagine being a CSAR pilot who disagrees with the 🤡’s illegal invasion and finding yourself having to do that job.

Bewareofstepfords · 05/04/2026 23:07

ProudAmberTurtle · 05/04/2026 10:55

Go to America and talk about your anti US regime feelings and lots of people will agree with you, and nothing will happen to you.

Go to Iran and talk about your anti Iran regime feelings and lots of people will agree with you, and you will be murdered.

That's the difference.

Your first paragraph used to be true but can't be guaranteed under the Trump regime.
USA detention centres can be absolute hell holes.

Ihatetomatoes · 06/04/2026 00:29

Everybodys · 05/04/2026 13:17

It isn't.

This is a thread about a rescue that looks to have involved at minimum looking the other way by the locals. That makes the behaviour of the Iranian regime actually very relevant- a good chunk of their people utterly despise them, what with them doing shit like murdering thousands of protesters. If they didn't behave like that, perhaps the locals would be rather less sympathetic towards foreign fighters in a force that have also killed some Iranian civilians.

It's possible to oppose the war whilst still acknowledging this.

Exactly. Goes completely over the head of some posters though.

MissConductUS · 06/04/2026 00:47

DaringDarlingDebbie · 05/04/2026 22:48

It was daring though wasn’t it, and extremely dangerous. Imagine being a CSAR pilot who disagrees with the 🤡’s illegal invasion and finding yourself having to do that job.

Your agreement with the "illegal invasion" mission or lack thereof would be completely irrelevant. You would gladly carry out your orders to rescue a fellow airman.

Swipe left for the next trending thread