Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East

Jewish and very conflicted re Israel, thoughts please?

144 replies

Newbutoldfather · 17/12/2025 12:00

Please bear with me as I suspect this will be quite long and my own thoughts aren’t really as clear as they should be, but I am curious about your thoughts on this.

I am early 60s, grew up in North London as a secular Jew. Like most Jews I was brought up with stories of the Holocaust and how Israel was founded as a safe haven for U.S. Jews.

I visited there only once as a young adult and toured Jerusalem, Haifa, Tel Aviv, Dead Sea, Masada etc. I was welcomed by all and had an amazing time.

And Israel was a plucky little liberal democracy in a see of enemies, whom they vanquished against the odds.

But, over time, the demographics and politics have changed. There is no question that elements of the government are profoundly racist. This is something I could not imagine when I was young. Add to that a growing muscularity, backed by Trump, and Israel is now a regional superpower (complete with a large nuclear deterrent). I think this confers upon it some responsibility.

There is little question that Israel has committed war crimes, although I don’t believe it has committed genocide. It has also run a torture prison (Sde Teiman), something that is an anathema to most liberal Jews. And the aggressive settlers in the West Bank, given a nod and a wink by Ben G’vir are behaving appallingly.

Zionism is a much used word and, sadly, many don’t agree on its meaning. I am 100% a Zionist in believing in Israel’s right to a peaceful existence and in it defending itself. I am not when I am demanded to back Netanyahu and his cronies.

So, here is the problem. How much of the increasing violence amongst the diaspora should Israel take responsibility for, if any?

Nothing excuses antisemitism, but I can see it being amplified by increasingly aggressive social media posts on both sides is just polarising the issue. Israel may (or may not) have been justified for taking some of its more aggressive actions in Gaza but, regardless, fire emojis by Israeli flags when a hospital has just been destroyed, complete with all the patients, is going to get a reaction!

So, in my opinion, just as the Versailles treaty in no way justified Nazism, Israel in no way justifies antisemitism. But that doesn’t mean it doesn’t explain the conditions necessary for it to flourish, or not understanding that humiliating the losers of a war creates conditions under which extremism can flourish.

So, if you are Jewish, how much of your backing of Israel is conditional upon its actions, if any?

(all welcome to comment , Jewish or otherwise).

OP posts:
AttackCat · 17/12/2025 16:15

dairydebris · 17/12/2025 15:56

Agree, I think, particularly with the othering of other states in the region- who are somehow not expected to meet the same standards... actually I can't understand how it can be anything other than racism in one direction or the other.

But in other respects there are very real, practical reasons why it makes sense for people in the UK to be vocal about the actions of the Israeli government in a way that's less relevant to other states/actors in the region and beyond.

When your government is supplying weapons to another government, then it's much more relevant to critique that government's actions in defence and war than a government to whom we are not providing that support.

In once sense I agree with you that everyone should be held to the same standards but also risks quickly descending into "whataboutery".

Newbutoldfather · 17/12/2025 16:16

I would really like to thank everyone for their interesting and thoughtful contributions.

I was afraid this thread might turn into a bunfight, but I am very pleasantly surprised.

It is nice to be able to discuss and even disagree in a civilised manner.

OP posts:
Newbutoldfather · 17/12/2025 16:18

@dairydebris ,

‘Agree, I think, particularly with the othering of other states in the region- who are somehow not expected to meet the same standards... actually I can't understand how it can be anything other than racism in one direction or the other.’

Some of it might be racism but some of it might be criticising a good friend who is making bad decisions.

Israel might just listen and change, whereas criticising Iran, say, is just whistling in the wind.

OP posts:
Westfacing · 17/12/2025 16:20

I think because you said you were Jewish and conflicted helped this thread not turn into a bunfight.

I'm not Jewish and am conflicted because I support the Palestinian people but not Hamas.

PoppysAunt · 17/12/2025 16:25

Newbutoldfather · 17/12/2025 16:18

@dairydebris ,

‘Agree, I think, particularly with the othering of other states in the region- who are somehow not expected to meet the same standards... actually I can't understand how it can be anything other than racism in one direction or the other.’

Some of it might be racism but some of it might be criticising a good friend who is making bad decisions.

Israel might just listen and change, whereas criticising Iran, say, is just whistling in the wind.

That's actually a really good point.

racoonsinbins · 17/12/2025 16:26

Dilbertian · 17/12/2025 13:26

Hamas's objective on 7 October 2023 was never the liberation of
Gaza or the creation of a Palestinian state. It was exactly this. Exactly your response, and many similar ones: to reduce Israel's standing in the West, to spread hatred of Israel and of Jews. They knew exactly how Netanyahu's government would respond. They sacrificed their own children to this aim. And Netanyahu walked right into their trap. Charged into it.

Could he have done any different? Absolutely he had to attack. Hard. Cutting supplies of energy and water to Gaza? Yes, absolutely. When Israel withdrew from Gaza they left the infrastructure there. Before this conflict Gaza had a flourishing middle class and a university that attracted Arab students from across the Arab world. Gaza had the opportunity to develop. Gaza received more aid per capita from the UN than any other country worldwide. But Hamas policy was to divert aid to war. To use water pipes to make pipe bombs. To increase reliance on refugee camps. Israel was not responsible for Hamas's choices. What other nation is expected to keep supplying their attackers with water and electricity?

OTOH, keeping international aid out of Gaza, and keeping international observers away from the conflict? I think that was a massive error of judgement, both humanitarian and political.

Hamas committed 1139 murders in their pogrom on 7 October

Israeli citizens = ~ 9.8m

ie ~0.012% of the population murdered in one day

Add the 251 hostages brings it to ~0.016% of the population murdered or taken hostage in one day.

Now apply those percentages to the UK population:

0.016% of 68million = 10,628

Hamas’ pogrom in Israel was the equivalent of over 10,000 UK citizens being brutally murdered or taken hostage in one day.

Last Night of the Proms: 6,000 people
Luton’s Kenilworth Rd stadium: 10,300 capacity
No 1 court Wimbledon 12,345 capacity

Imagine one of these events being attacked, and everyone present being brutally murdered or taken hostage. And the venue burnt down.

Here’s what 1000 people looks like, and what 10,000 people looks like.

How do you think the UK government would have responded, had terrorists attacked Kenilworth Road Stadium, brutally murdered almost everybody present, raping and burning people, and taking several hundred hostage? Do you think our government, any government, would have reacted mildly? Do you think our citizens would have reacted mildly to compatriots of the perpetrators residing among us?

I disagree with much that Netanyahu and his right wing ideologues do. But I also believe that Israel is held up to double standards by people who cannot imagine anything like this happening in our lovely, safe, Western countries. And after Manchester and Bondi, people need to think again.

@dilbertian I can understand the visceral response to such an atrocity from Israelis, but but your method of calculation, the response from Israel would have been to kill the equivalent of well over a million people within the UK. How would we have responded to that and could we ever move on?

@Newbutoldfather thank you for your reflective post - this conflict has certainly challenged allegiance and beliefs and made us question how best lasting peace can be achieved.

AttackCat · 17/12/2025 16:30

Newbutoldfather · 17/12/2025 16:18

@dairydebris ,

‘Agree, I think, particularly with the othering of other states in the region- who are somehow not expected to meet the same standards... actually I can't understand how it can be anything other than racism in one direction or the other.’

Some of it might be racism but some of it might be criticising a good friend who is making bad decisions.

Israel might just listen and change, whereas criticising Iran, say, is just whistling in the wind.

Yes I think there's an element of this.

I also think there's an element amongst some of the left-wing support for Palestine that is generally anti-establishment and sees Israel as being part of the establishment.

(I say this as someone who is both fairly left wing and critical of Israel).

PoppysAunt · 17/12/2025 16:32

AttackCat · 17/12/2025 16:30

Yes I think there's an element of this.

I also think there's an element amongst some of the left-wing support for Palestine that is generally anti-establishment and sees Israel as being part of the establishment.

(I say this as someone who is both fairly left wing and critical of Israel).

Yes, I think that's a very good point.

MrsTerryPratchett · 17/12/2025 16:33

PoppysAunt · 17/12/2025 15:30

So you would excuse the men of Afghanistan in a way that you wouldn't excuse the men of Israel?

So you'd 'reductio ad absurdum' is one of the many issues with having a conversation about this. As @MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBacksays, there are reasons, probably actually Islamophobic and colonialist ones, why we hold Israel to a different standard.

Of course I don't excuse male violence anywhere. But do I blame random non-combatants in a dictatoship like Afghanistan for the actions of the Taliban? Of course not. Do I hold voters partially responsible for the forseeable actions of their elected leaders? Yes, I do.

PoppysAunt · 17/12/2025 16:39

MrsTerryPratchett · 17/12/2025 16:33

So you'd 'reductio ad absurdum' is one of the many issues with having a conversation about this. As @MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBacksays, there are reasons, probably actually Islamophobic and colonialist ones, why we hold Israel to a different standard.

Of course I don't excuse male violence anywhere. But do I blame random non-combatants in a dictatoship like Afghanistan for the actions of the Taliban? Of course not. Do I hold voters partially responsible for the forseeable actions of their elected leaders? Yes, I do.

No. It's not "reductio ad absurdum".
I'm joining in a conversation about different regimes being held to different standards - it's genuinely a curious thing. How do we reconcile this? If we say something is ok from one nation, but not another?
Why are Israelis held to a higher standard, as pp have said?
Posters have attempted to answer that, so do not dismiss my point.
It's been a very civilised discussion thus far.

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 17/12/2025 17:05

PoppysAunt · 17/12/2025 16:10

Yes, although I think the problem with the Taliban, the Muslim Brotherhood, and of course Hamas is that their aim is to establish a Caliphate. I don't think there's any way to progress with this kind of fascist, theocratic, misogynist, homophobic, antisemitic world view.

Well, I don't think the Taliban or their ilk are going to suddenly change any time soon either, but I absolutely hold out the hope that more progressive thinkers in those countries will ultimately find a way of gaining power.

But what you say underlines my point, really. Regimes like the Tailban do not purport to share our values in the way that most liberal democracies do. That doesn't mean that we believe that their citizens should have fewer rights than we do, or indeed that they would be any less capable of living in a society where their rights were respected. It is merely a recognition - and perhaps to some extent an acceptance - that they are currently living in a society which does not aspire to the same ideals or values.

PoppysAunt · 17/12/2025 17:11

Well, stranger things have happened, @MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack .
So we can only hope, as you say.

dairydebris · 17/12/2025 17:24

MrsTerryPratchett · 17/12/2025 16:33

So you'd 'reductio ad absurdum' is one of the many issues with having a conversation about this. As @MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBacksays, there are reasons, probably actually Islamophobic and colonialist ones, why we hold Israel to a different standard.

Of course I don't excuse male violence anywhere. But do I blame random non-combatants in a dictatoship like Afghanistan for the actions of the Taliban? Of course not. Do I hold voters partially responsible for the forseeable actions of their elected leaders? Yes, I do.

Do you hold the adults in Gaza who voted for Hamas partially responsible for 7 October? Hamas were explicit about their aims in the election they won. Like you said, foreseeable actions.

Problematic isnt it?

You can't hold citizens responsible for the actions of their elected governments. Neither Jewish nor Palestinian. You can only hold people responsible for their own actions.

Israel is not responsible for antisemitism. We cannot go down that road with any nation.

SisterTeatime · 17/12/2025 17:40

I think there is a strong element of racism in some pro-Palestine rhetoric, which portrays Palestinians like children, with no agency. Most people disagree with the West Bank settler situation and the extreme element of the Israeli government. It seems harder for some pro-Palestinians to accept that there is anything their ‘side’ does that’s not somehow Israel’s fault.

also it’s worth remembering that Israel’s electoral system makes for difficult coalitions - I don’t know how many Israelis voted for Netanyahu - and their government is subject to plenty of scrutiny and protests by Israelis. It is a democracy albeit a flawed one (and a pretty embattled one)

Its important to remind ourselves as @Ddakji did that Israel was working with Saudi Arabia to normalise relations when Oct 7 happened.

I also think it’s important to remember why Israel is needed, as the ONLY Jewish state. I feel uncomfortable when posters say things like ‘religion is the problem’ which seems to me to deny Jews’ ethnic identity and ignores the absolutely tiny numbers of Jews there are. I agree that the ultra-orthodox are problematic - but extremists in any religion are.

PoppysAunt · 17/12/2025 17:40

dairydebris · 17/12/2025 17:24

Do you hold the adults in Gaza who voted for Hamas partially responsible for 7 October? Hamas were explicit about their aims in the election they won. Like you said, foreseeable actions.

Problematic isnt it?

You can't hold citizens responsible for the actions of their elected governments. Neither Jewish nor Palestinian. You can only hold people responsible for their own actions.

Israel is not responsible for antisemitism. We cannot go down that road with any nation.

Very good points 👍

PoppysAunt · 17/12/2025 17:43

@SisterTeatime , yes, I agree. Particularly the issue of the various coalitions in Israeli governments.

Twiglets1 · 17/12/2025 17:57

SisterTeatime · 17/12/2025 17:40

I think there is a strong element of racism in some pro-Palestine rhetoric, which portrays Palestinians like children, with no agency. Most people disagree with the West Bank settler situation and the extreme element of the Israeli government. It seems harder for some pro-Palestinians to accept that there is anything their ‘side’ does that’s not somehow Israel’s fault.

also it’s worth remembering that Israel’s electoral system makes for difficult coalitions - I don’t know how many Israelis voted for Netanyahu - and their government is subject to plenty of scrutiny and protests by Israelis. It is a democracy albeit a flawed one (and a pretty embattled one)

Its important to remind ourselves as @Ddakji did that Israel was working with Saudi Arabia to normalise relations when Oct 7 happened.

I also think it’s important to remember why Israel is needed, as the ONLY Jewish state. I feel uncomfortable when posters say things like ‘religion is the problem’ which seems to me to deny Jews’ ethnic identity and ignores the absolutely tiny numbers of Jews there are. I agree that the ultra-orthodox are problematic - but extremists in any religion are.

I agree with this post especially the point that Most people disagree with the West Bank settler situation and the extreme element of the Israeli government. It seems harder for some pro-Palestinians to accept that there is anything their ‘side’ does that’s not somehow Israel’s fault.

I feel conflicted too @Newbutoldfather as a non Jewish person who generally supports Israel but not the every aspect of what their government is doing. I don't support any extremists, including the more right wing element of the Israeli government. I don't support the Settlers. I definitely feel like bad decisions have been made, for example to withhold humanitarian aid.

But also - I do very much sympathise with the situation Israel found themselves in on 7/10/23 and feel like had that happened in the UK, I would have expected our government to fight back hard too.

Newbutoldfather · 17/12/2025 17:59

@SisterTeatime ,

‘also it’s worth remembering that Israel’s electoral system makes for difficult coalitions - I don’t know how many Israelis voted for Netanyahu - and their government is subject to plenty of scrutiny and protests by Israelis. It is a democracy albeit a flawed one (and a pretty embattled one)’

Yes, PR does make for ‘difficult’ coalitions, but the Israeli religious party is similar to the BNP, openly racist. Can you imagine a couple of BNP ministers in the UK government and this being excused?

https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Politics/Otzma_political_platform.pdf

So, this is their manifesto. And, remember, that is what they are prepared to commit to paper. They have said far worse in private.

https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Politics/Otzma_political_platform.pdf

OP posts:
dairydebris · 17/12/2025 18:02

SisterTeatime · 17/12/2025 17:40

I think there is a strong element of racism in some pro-Palestine rhetoric, which portrays Palestinians like children, with no agency. Most people disagree with the West Bank settler situation and the extreme element of the Israeli government. It seems harder for some pro-Palestinians to accept that there is anything their ‘side’ does that’s not somehow Israel’s fault.

also it’s worth remembering that Israel’s electoral system makes for difficult coalitions - I don’t know how many Israelis voted for Netanyahu - and their government is subject to plenty of scrutiny and protests by Israelis. It is a democracy albeit a flawed one (and a pretty embattled one)

Its important to remind ourselves as @Ddakji did that Israel was working with Saudi Arabia to normalise relations when Oct 7 happened.

I also think it’s important to remember why Israel is needed, as the ONLY Jewish state. I feel uncomfortable when posters say things like ‘religion is the problem’ which seems to me to deny Jews’ ethnic identity and ignores the absolutely tiny numbers of Jews there are. I agree that the ultra-orthodox are problematic - but extremists in any religion are.

Agree with all of this.

dairydebris · 17/12/2025 18:05

Newbutoldfather · 17/12/2025 17:59

@SisterTeatime ,

‘also it’s worth remembering that Israel’s electoral system makes for difficult coalitions - I don’t know how many Israelis voted for Netanyahu - and their government is subject to plenty of scrutiny and protests by Israelis. It is a democracy albeit a flawed one (and a pretty embattled one)’

Yes, PR does make for ‘difficult’ coalitions, but the Israeli religious party is similar to the BNP, openly racist. Can you imagine a couple of BNP ministers in the UK government and this being excused?

https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Politics/Otzma_political_platform.pdf

So, this is their manifesto. And, remember, that is what they are prepared to commit to paper. They have said far worse in private.

Demographic problem heh. Quite chilling.

AttackCat · 17/12/2025 18:23

PoppysAunt · 17/12/2025 16:39

No. It's not "reductio ad absurdum".
I'm joining in a conversation about different regimes being held to different standards - it's genuinely a curious thing. How do we reconcile this? If we say something is ok from one nation, but not another?
Why are Israelis held to a higher standard, as pp have said?
Posters have attempted to answer that, so do not dismiss my point.
It's been a very civilised discussion thus far.

I don’t think it’s saying that it’s OK for some to do and not OK for others, and things like international law must apply equally to everyone. It’s more a case of how outspoken the criticism is - which in the case of Israel I think can be attributed to various factors. Not denying for a moment antisemitism is one of those factors.

PoppysAunt · 17/12/2025 18:30

AttackCat · 17/12/2025 18:23

I don’t think it’s saying that it’s OK for some to do and not OK for others, and things like international law must apply equally to everyone. It’s more a case of how outspoken the criticism is - which in the case of Israel I think can be attributed to various factors. Not denying for a moment antisemitism is one of those factors.

Yes, I would agree 👍

HappyFace2025 · 17/12/2025 18:41

Newbutoldfather · 17/12/2025 12:00

Please bear with me as I suspect this will be quite long and my own thoughts aren’t really as clear as they should be, but I am curious about your thoughts on this.

I am early 60s, grew up in North London as a secular Jew. Like most Jews I was brought up with stories of the Holocaust and how Israel was founded as a safe haven for U.S. Jews.

I visited there only once as a young adult and toured Jerusalem, Haifa, Tel Aviv, Dead Sea, Masada etc. I was welcomed by all and had an amazing time.

And Israel was a plucky little liberal democracy in a see of enemies, whom they vanquished against the odds.

But, over time, the demographics and politics have changed. There is no question that elements of the government are profoundly racist. This is something I could not imagine when I was young. Add to that a growing muscularity, backed by Trump, and Israel is now a regional superpower (complete with a large nuclear deterrent). I think this confers upon it some responsibility.

There is little question that Israel has committed war crimes, although I don’t believe it has committed genocide. It has also run a torture prison (Sde Teiman), something that is an anathema to most liberal Jews. And the aggressive settlers in the West Bank, given a nod and a wink by Ben G’vir are behaving appallingly.

Zionism is a much used word and, sadly, many don’t agree on its meaning. I am 100% a Zionist in believing in Israel’s right to a peaceful existence and in it defending itself. I am not when I am demanded to back Netanyahu and his cronies.

So, here is the problem. How much of the increasing violence amongst the diaspora should Israel take responsibility for, if any?

Nothing excuses antisemitism, but I can see it being amplified by increasingly aggressive social media posts on both sides is just polarising the issue. Israel may (or may not) have been justified for taking some of its more aggressive actions in Gaza but, regardless, fire emojis by Israeli flags when a hospital has just been destroyed, complete with all the patients, is going to get a reaction!

So, in my opinion, just as the Versailles treaty in no way justified Nazism, Israel in no way justifies antisemitism. But that doesn’t mean it doesn’t explain the conditions necessary for it to flourish, or not understanding that humiliating the losers of a war creates conditions under which extremism can flourish.

So, if you are Jewish, how much of your backing of Israel is conditional upon its actions, if any?

(all welcome to comment , Jewish or otherwise).

I am older than you OP and have also visited Israel where I have relatives. I HRTFT but
a) I am a secular Jew
b) i don't believe for one moment that Israel's actions to protect all her citizens from Hamas has been over the top. What few people seem to understand is the constant fear Israelis (whatever their religion or ethnicity) have on a daily basis from rocket attacks and bombings within their territory
c) the rapid increase of antisemitism here and elsewhere in the world is fuelled by misinformation too easily found on TikTok, X Instagram etc
d) when primary aged children have to be taught 'Sleeping Lions' and play dead in the event of a gunman entering their classroom here in London, I know there is something disgustingly evil within our society
e) the result of the above has made me more proud of my Jewish heritage and I am just as proud to be a Zionist. A century ago we had nowhere to go to escape the Holocaust. Now we do.

PoppysAunt · 17/12/2025 18:54

Newbutoldfather · 17/12/2025 17:59

@SisterTeatime ,

‘also it’s worth remembering that Israel’s electoral system makes for difficult coalitions - I don’t know how many Israelis voted for Netanyahu - and their government is subject to plenty of scrutiny and protests by Israelis. It is a democracy albeit a flawed one (and a pretty embattled one)’

Yes, PR does make for ‘difficult’ coalitions, but the Israeli religious party is similar to the BNP, openly racist. Can you imagine a couple of BNP ministers in the UK government and this being excused?

https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Politics/Otzma_political_platform.pdf

So, this is their manifesto. And, remember, that is what they are prepared to commit to paper. They have said far worse in private.

That's why I'm glad we don't have PR.
Some European governments regularly have extreme politicians as part of their coalition.

SisterTeatime · 17/12/2025 19:57

Newbutoldfather · 17/12/2025 17:59

@SisterTeatime ,

‘also it’s worth remembering that Israel’s electoral system makes for difficult coalitions - I don’t know how many Israelis voted for Netanyahu - and their government is subject to plenty of scrutiny and protests by Israelis. It is a democracy albeit a flawed one (and a pretty embattled one)’

Yes, PR does make for ‘difficult’ coalitions, but the Israeli religious party is similar to the BNP, openly racist. Can you imagine a couple of BNP ministers in the UK government and this being excused?

https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Politics/Otzma_political_platform.pdf

So, this is their manifesto. And, remember, that is what they are prepared to commit to paper. They have said far worse in private.

Thank you. I agree, it’s troubling and not something we would want here. One reason I’m not in favour of PR.