Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East

How is forced starvation allowed?

1000 replies

Tinycatnoise · 23/07/2025 22:28

The top story in the BBC right now is the starvation of Gazans by Israel. The images are horrifying and not dissimilar to seeing those images of concentration camps in Nazi Germany. I cried seeing those and am crying now. I am sure someone will claim antisemitism because of this statement, but anyone looking at these images of starving children would agree.

How is this still going on? I feel like we are watching a genocide take place that the world has turning a blind eye to. The daily shooting by Israel of people trying to get aid too is just barbaric. If nothing is being done to stop this, what is the next horror that will unfold in the world that people will just accept?

www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ce9xkx7vnmxo

OP posts:
Thread gallery
41
SharonEllis · 26/07/2025 19:28

Anonimummy · 26/07/2025 19:21

An important consideration for me though is the MSM are often not reporting stuff that I can see on X with quite a bit of fact checking already done, or they are reporting it from a one sided or distorted angle.

The recent reports on the incidents involving the Holy Family Church in Gaza and the village of Taybeh were cases in point IMO.

I totally agree. X used to be a brilliant source for access to all sorts of peple, news good writing. Less so now, but still useful. As long as you have the skills to evaluate the reliability of posts there is absolutely nothing wrong with it. X is not a source as such anyway. Its a platform for sources.

Anonimummy · 26/07/2025 19:29

PinkBobby · 26/07/2025 19:15

But can you not see the difference between quoting a ‘media personality’ on X and suggesting they represent the ‘Arab World’ vs using it to connect you to clips like this one?

I didn’t say he represented the Arab world. I said his was A view from the Arab world which I thought was very succinct and surprising to me tbh.

Why are you deliberately distorting what I said?

PinkBobby · 26/07/2025 20:08

Anonimummy · 26/07/2025 19:29

I didn’t say he represented the Arab world. I said his was A view from the Arab world which I thought was very succinct and surprising to me tbh.

Why are you deliberately distorting what I said?

Apologies, I misquoted you from another post.

Kakeandkake · 26/07/2025 20:11

The singer then added: "They're lying. [Benjamin] Netanyahu lies, is a liar. The IDF are lying. They're dangling food in front of starving, panicked, exhausted mothers.
"And while they arrive to accept the tiny amount of food that this sort of set up pantomime outfit, the Gaza Humanitarian Front, I would call it, as they dangle it, then they're shot wantonly.

PinkBobby · 26/07/2025 20:14

SharonEllis · 26/07/2025 19:28

I totally agree. X used to be a brilliant source for access to all sorts of peple, news good writing. Less so now, but still useful. As long as you have the skills to evaluate the reliability of posts there is absolutely nothing wrong with it. X is not a source as such anyway. Its a platform for sources.

I agree it can provide you with access to a range of sources but as you say, it has become much less useful as the trustworthy seem few and far between nowadays. I take back my initial comment and agree that as a platform it can connect you to reliable sources but is much more likely nowadays to trap you in an echo chamber of which ever side you fall on. Hence why I think it’s better to stay away from X’s algorithms and put in a little more work to find a range of sources that create a more balanced picture of what is going on.

SharonEllis · 26/07/2025 20:15

PinkBobby · 26/07/2025 20:14

I agree it can provide you with access to a range of sources but as you say, it has become much less useful as the trustworthy seem few and far between nowadays. I take back my initial comment and agree that as a platform it can connect you to reliable sources but is much more likely nowadays to trap you in an echo chamber of which ever side you fall on. Hence why I think it’s better to stay away from X’s algorithms and put in a little more work to find a range of sources that create a more balanced picture of what is going on.

Thank you.

TooBigForMyBoots · 26/07/2025 20:31

Anonimummy · 26/07/2025 19:11

I guess it depends who you consider trustworthy, depending if they fit in with your narrative, for a lot of people.

I consider this Palestinian very genuine with important things to say on behalf of Palestinian children but his speech in the European Parliament was posted on X so does that make the post untrustworthy?

https://x.com/Adi13/status/1948925391428522090

Stop peddling your ridiculous conspiracy theory that Palestinians are starving themselves and their families.🙄

EllytheNelephant · 26/07/2025 23:12

Looks like even Israeli military officials are speaking out against the "its Hamas and/or the UN's fault" narrative.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/26/world/middleeast/hamas-un-aid-theft.html?unlocked_article_code=1.ZU8.zR1x.cpLjibz4NtZ0&smid=re-share

quantumbutterfly · 26/07/2025 23:25

Anonimummy · 26/07/2025 19:29

I didn’t say he represented the Arab world. I said his was A view from the Arab world which I thought was very succinct and surprising to me tbh.

Why are you deliberately distorting what I said?

Amjad Taha - some thought provoking things on his twitter feed.
Some even more thought provoking comments under his you tube vids.

PaxAeterna · 26/07/2025 23:39

quantumbutterfly · 26/07/2025 23:25

Amjad Taha - some thought provoking things on his twitter feed.
Some even more thought provoking comments under his you tube vids.

looked him up. Really can’t see how anything he says would justify forced starvation. What am I missing?

1dayatatime · 27/07/2025 02:27

@Flumpflimpo

"Hamas was the aggressor in this wave of the conflict"

"That is absolutel bullshit @SharonEllis and you know it.
Hamas attacked Israel for two days, october 7th and October 8th in 2023.
In retaliation, Israel have been attacking and bombing Gaza for one year and a half..
If one side attacks for two days, and the otjrr side attacks for a year and a half, which side is more of the aggressor?
Israel is."

So Japan attacked US for 1 hour 15 minutes at Pearl Harbour. The USA then responded with a war lasting 3 years and 10 months.

According to your logic would you say that the US was the oppressor against Japan.

I think this comment highlights really well the lens of oppressor and oppressed from the left. In economics the workers are seen as the oppressed and the business owners the oppressors even if the workers are much better off than they were before they were employed, simply because the owner is making more money than the workers (despite taking the financial risk of setting up the company).

In wars and conflicts the oppressor is always whichever side is stronger (especially if they are Western and even more so if they are American) and the oppressed is always the losing or weaker side. How the conflict actually started is irrelevant through this left wing lens.

SharonEllis · 27/07/2025 06:17

1dayatatime · 27/07/2025 02:27

@Flumpflimpo

"Hamas was the aggressor in this wave of the conflict"

"That is absolutel bullshit @SharonEllis and you know it.
Hamas attacked Israel for two days, october 7th and October 8th in 2023.
In retaliation, Israel have been attacking and bombing Gaza for one year and a half..
If one side attacks for two days, and the otjrr side attacks for a year and a half, which side is more of the aggressor?
Israel is."

So Japan attacked US for 1 hour 15 minutes at Pearl Harbour. The USA then responded with a war lasting 3 years and 10 months.

According to your logic would you say that the US was the oppressor against Japan.

I think this comment highlights really well the lens of oppressor and oppressed from the left. In economics the workers are seen as the oppressed and the business owners the oppressors even if the workers are much better off than they were before they were employed, simply because the owner is making more money than the workers (despite taking the financial risk of setting up the company).

In wars and conflicts the oppressor is always whichever side is stronger (especially if they are Western and even more so if they are American) and the oppressed is always the losing or weaker side. How the conflict actually started is irrelevant through this left wing lens.

I know, its ridiculous. I mean obviously Hamas was the aggressor, they declared war on Israel effectively and said they would keep attacking them. Israel fought back. Obviously Israel has fought back proportionately harder and has bigger capabilities. Thst doesn't change the original fact.

Twiglets1 · 27/07/2025 06:46

1dayatatime · 27/07/2025 02:27

@Flumpflimpo

"Hamas was the aggressor in this wave of the conflict"

"That is absolutel bullshit @SharonEllis and you know it.
Hamas attacked Israel for two days, october 7th and October 8th in 2023.
In retaliation, Israel have been attacking and bombing Gaza for one year and a half..
If one side attacks for two days, and the otjrr side attacks for a year and a half, which side is more of the aggressor?
Israel is."

So Japan attacked US for 1 hour 15 minutes at Pearl Harbour. The USA then responded with a war lasting 3 years and 10 months.

According to your logic would you say that the US was the oppressor against Japan.

I think this comment highlights really well the lens of oppressor and oppressed from the left. In economics the workers are seen as the oppressed and the business owners the oppressors even if the workers are much better off than they were before they were employed, simply because the owner is making more money than the workers (despite taking the financial risk of setting up the company).

In wars and conflicts the oppressor is always whichever side is stronger (especially if they are Western and even more so if they are American) and the oppressed is always the losing or weaker side. How the conflict actually started is irrelevant through this left wing lens.

Japan was the aggressor because they started it in the same way as Hamas were the aggressor when they started this current war.

You then change the word to “oppressor” which has a different meaning. I would agree that the Palestinian people are being oppressed by the Israeli government and the IDF but Hamas were still the aggressors on 7/10.

Alexandra2001 · 27/07/2025 07:04

1dayatatime · 27/07/2025 02:27

@Flumpflimpo

"Hamas was the aggressor in this wave of the conflict"

"That is absolutel bullshit @SharonEllis and you know it.
Hamas attacked Israel for two days, october 7th and October 8th in 2023.
In retaliation, Israel have been attacking and bombing Gaza for one year and a half..
If one side attacks for two days, and the otjrr side attacks for a year and a half, which side is more of the aggressor?
Israel is."

So Japan attacked US for 1 hour 15 minutes at Pearl Harbour. The USA then responded with a war lasting 3 years and 10 months.

According to your logic would you say that the US was the oppressor against Japan.

I think this comment highlights really well the lens of oppressor and oppressed from the left. In economics the workers are seen as the oppressed and the business owners the oppressors even if the workers are much better off than they were before they were employed, simply because the owner is making more money than the workers (despite taking the financial risk of setting up the company).

In wars and conflicts the oppressor is always whichever side is stronger (especially if they are Western and even more so if they are American) and the oppressed is always the losing or weaker side. How the conflict actually started is irrelevant through this left wing lens.

Left wing lens??? You do realise that people across the political spectrum, here and in other countries are speaking out against the brutality the IDF is using in Gaza?
But no, it doesn't suit your right wing lens does it....

Once again we come back to "Hamas attacked first, we can then do as we want.... including using food aid as a weapon of war" when your cheerleader is Donald Trump, you can be sure you're in the wrong.

Even that ignores the fact the "conflict" started long before 7/10, though once again, the 'right like to forget about that.

People across the world can see that the Israeli govt is using Collective punishment on Gazans and hopefully the International Courts will call it what it is: War Crimes and the people responsible, inc Netanyahu in court.

smallglassbottle · 27/07/2025 08:30

Kakeandkake · 26/07/2025 20:12

The GHF organised a women's only aid day but that also didn't stop the IDF shooting and killing women aid seekers.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c74z4gy5g31o

Wtaf?!

PinkBobby · 27/07/2025 08:58

And just as predicted, Israel suddenly can do something about the situation - the world is shocked by images of dying children, the Israeli govt PR machine freaks out and now they can ‘open aid corridors’.

“Israel says it will implement humanitarian corridors to enable the safe movement of UN convoys in Gaza.”

“The United Arab Emirates (UAE) says it will resume air drops of aid into Gaza immediately - after Israel said it would allow foreign countries to drop supplies into the Strip.”

To anyone who said the famine was solely Hamas’s doing, does any of this impact your views?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/ckg42k37e2pt

Israel announces 'tactical pause' to fighting in parts of Gaza and says it will open aid corridors - live updates

Pressure has mounted on Israel after dire warnings of mass starvation in Gaza in the face of a growing hunger crisis.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/ckg42k37e2pt

smallglassbottle · 27/07/2025 09:03

PinkBobby · 27/07/2025 08:58

And just as predicted, Israel suddenly can do something about the situation - the world is shocked by images of dying children, the Israeli govt PR machine freaks out and now they can ‘open aid corridors’.

“Israel says it will implement humanitarian corridors to enable the safe movement of UN convoys in Gaza.”

“The United Arab Emirates (UAE) says it will resume air drops of aid into Gaza immediately - after Israel said it would allow foreign countries to drop supplies into the Strip.”

To anyone who said the famine was solely Hamas’s doing, does any of this impact your views?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/ckg42k37e2pt

They're just pissing about and playing for time. The more Palestinians that die, the easier it will be for israel to deal with what's left. Hence this endless change in behaviour and rhetoric every few days.

Despicable.

Twiglets1 · 27/07/2025 09:10

@PinkBobby it doesn't change my view because despite being pro Israel, I never said the famine was solely Hamas’s doing.

I hold Hamas ultimately responsible for the hell unleashed on their own people by their decision to massacre and kidnap Israeli citizens on 7/10.

But obviously (to most people) the Israel government also need to take responsibility for their decision to restrict humanitarian aid coming into Gaza. This was not something I supported and I'm relieved they have now recognised the need to facilitate more aid coming in.

PinkBobby · 27/07/2025 09:16

Twiglets1 · 27/07/2025 09:10

@PinkBobby it doesn't change my view because despite being pro Israel, I never said the famine was solely Hamas’s doing.

I hold Hamas ultimately responsible for the hell unleashed on their own people by their decision to massacre and kidnap Israeli citizens on 7/10.

But obviously (to most people) the Israel government also need to take responsibility for their decision to restrict humanitarian aid coming into Gaza. This was not something I supported and I'm relieved they have now recognised the need to facilitate more aid coming in.

Thank you for commenting - you’re the first pro Israel person I’ve seen who has acknowledged that Israel are at least partly to blame for the current famine situation and that is refreshing.

Twiglets1 · 27/07/2025 10:24

@Kakeandkake The problem with quoting Bob Geldof is that he isn't a particularly reliable source (despite the good work he did with Live Aid).

The Sky news article you posted reports that Bob Geldof said 1,000 children or people have died of starvation this month.

Hamas said the total number of people who have died from a lack of food reached 127 on Friday.

Twiglets1 · 27/07/2025 10:30

Thinking about it - that was a rare propaganda fail from Hamas wasn't it? They should have allowed people to carry on creating their own ideas about how many Gazans had died of starvation. Because for those that want to demonise Israel, the fantasy was always likely to exceed the reality.

PaxAeterna · 27/07/2025 10:34

Yes Bob geldof is just a random punter expressing his condemnation of what’s happening and getting the number of deaths wrong. Unfortunately the numbers dying will increase to 1000 soon enough.

Twiglets1 · 27/07/2025 10:41

PaxAeterna · 27/07/2025 10:34

Yes Bob geldof is just a random punter expressing his condemnation of what’s happening and getting the number of deaths wrong. Unfortunately the numbers dying will increase to 1000 soon enough.

Not just "wrong" but crazily wrong - the difference between 127 in total and 1000 this month alone. He is someone that people will listen to because of who he is.

I sincerely hope that the numbers dying from lack of food does not reach 1000.

I'm not naively thinking there will be no more deaths from malnutrition though. Obviously, the lack of good quality food has hit vulnerable people hard especially children and babies needing special formula milk.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.