We were discussing how Hamas seized power in the Gaza Strip and the story that they were peacefully elected by terrorist supporters is a bit of an oversimplification.
Yes, Hamas won an election for the Gaza Strip, but that was promptly overturned by the Palestinian Authority.
It wasn’t until months later when Hamas win was publicly endorsed by US President George Bush, the EU, Russia and UN that Hamas staged their six-day military coup.
If the PA’s decision to overturn the election had not been challenged by the most powerful nations in the world, would Hamas ever have taken over? I think it is a fair question tbh.
The point is, if we say the Gazans then who voted for Hamas were terrorist supporters, then surely the same applies to US President George Bush, the UN, Russia and EU (which included the U.K. at the time) because this entire list all pushed for Hamas to get rule over Gaza….
After all, not only did Gazans back Hamas at the time, but so did the rest of the world.
Obviously, US President George Bush wasn’t a terrorist supporter, nor were Russia or the EU or the UN in 2006 so it seems a bit unfair to blame Gazans for an overturned vote while ignoring the major part our own governments played in clearing Hamas’ way to power.