levi Big congrats! Nothing insensitive about such positive news relayed so sensitively.x And congrats to you too amber - what a bag of roller-coaster emotions you must have experienced in recent days!
Cerubina What baffles me about some of my friends (not all) is how quickly they forget their own difficulties in TTC and waltz into that wonderful world some women have where TTC and babies is straightforward and sweetness and light, rather than this murkey world of hope and despair I feel I inhabit. But maybe its good they do.... Regardless, pillow-thrashing is a tip I might just take on myself to relieve frustration, rage and grief! My coping mechanism has been to opt out entirely from seeing all friends with babies and kids - so my life can be a bit lonely, but at least not filled with hurt.
Horton I'm due to test close to your time too, on Wednesday (well, according to fertilityfriend). But I have no self-restraint and tested yesterday and got an evaporation line which got my hopes up. Then tested again today to see, yes, defo a BFN. Doing that has racked my cool because, like you, I was feeling fairly sure I am not PG and was resolved about it. Than that damm line (even though it was a stupid 9DPO)!!. In my previous two pregnancies I had symptoms I'm not getting now either, so am trying hard to ensure logic rather than hope prevails. Will try very very hard not to test again!!
My news - after hearing what you lovely women had to say DH and I have decided to shake-up our GP and get referred no matter what she says. I will cry in her office if I have to, and I have no doubt that if I cry that DH will tear-up too because I've done that once before in her office and he did!! We tried this morning to get an appointment for tomorrow (stupid next day booking system), but despite being outside the door before the doors opened at 8.30, they were all gone. So next chance is Thurs next week, so I will get there before 8.15 on Weds and demand one.
Cerubina Thank you so much for the bit of research. x. I have that book which I bought after my first MC last year, but you reminded me to look again for fibroid advice. The Reagon book seems to confirm what the consultant who saw me said.
I have a submucous fibroid (only knew the proper name from the Regan book). If you imagine the uterine wall as the sea, my fibroid rises like a dome - some of it in the wall and some in the cavity. He said if I had surgery, it would leave scar tissue that would still leave about the same amount of wall space affected, so not really improve my implantation odds. He thinks that I'll be OK if implantation takes place in the remaining 80% unaffected. He also said he didn't think my two MCs were as a result of the fibroid. He said what would normally happen, is an emby wouldn't implant in that area and if it tried to, that month would be just like AF to me.
So .... whew, don't know what to think. He's not a gynae ... actually, I think he's an IVF expert .. mayeb that is a gynae??. Do you think I need to see someone else again?
On my risk of another miscarriage, ERI staff differ from Reagan on my risk. According to Reagan, after 2 MCs my risk of a successive 3rd rises to 24%. ERI tell me instead that I 'have no better or worse chance than any other woman despite two MCs'. When I pointed out that Reagan said risk of first miscarriage is very low, only about 5%, they said not in their experience and that MCs were very common in woman my age. Hard to reconcile the stats with the anecdotal evidence.
I think I might print these chapters for my GP, and highlight the relevant sections.
I HATE going to see my GP - always so stressful!!