@sickofthisyear Totally agree no definite conclusions can be drawn from one study, but there was almost no difference between 25-35 either in “truly fertile” couples. The main thing to note is age wasn’t a factor in conception.
Once conception has actually occurred we have lots more studies (the article linked by @Twelvestars details a few of these) that show the whole “fertility goes off a cliff at 35” thing simply isn’t true. So if you can conceive, you have WAY more chance of a live birth than not.
I do get how easy it is to be negative, but it’s up to the individual how they interpret the stats.
I’m mainly focussed on the over 40 data. Guess what the average life span was in the late 1600-1700s when they talk about fertility being minuscule? FORTY! 🤣 So of course there’s limited data of fertility over 40 - they were mainly dead!!! And if they were in their twilight years I doubt they were getting that jiggy.
Fine - I’ll grant you it’s not proof that fertility is a-okay post 40. But there isn’t any study, anywhere that proves fertility is f**ked either. There are A LOT of IVF studies of fertility-challenged women that are also used as “evidence” of a decline in fertility. Hmm...wonder why ivf clinics want you to think that...😆
If your tests say your fertile, I genuinely believe it’s just time. Maybe I’m too optimistic! 🤣