No. Who’s Lucy? 😂
It is very strange though.
November = Thanksgiving, commemorating the mother of all intolerant “Christian” religious sects (they only split from England as the English weren’t intolerant enough..let that sink in) who got fed by the Natives (and we all know what was done to the Natives). Marking that on its own is wacky, but the wackiness continues on to the next month...with...
December = Christmas, commemorating the birth of Christ, a day that the folk commemorated in the previous month BANNED.
Its a total contradiction.
Now if thanksgiving involved being thankful that the reign of terror by the sect didn’t inflict more damage than it did, then that would make sense. And Christmas celebrated the following month would then also be seen as a celebration of free exercise of religion, a proverbial middle finger to the bigoted, persecuting cult who banned it. This is the case in England (without actually knowing it) as the laws enacted by the puritans were declared null and void in 1660, and Christmas was again freely celebrated in England (the puritanical hold in the US would be much more pervasive and long-lasting, with Christmas only becoming a federal holiday in 1870).... in 1917 American poet HL Mencken would also write about the continuing pernicious influence of the puritans in America...
......”The Puritan's utter lack of aesthetic sense, his distrust of all romantic emotion, his unmatchable intolerance of opposition, his unbreakable belief in his own bleak and narrow views, his savage cruelty of attack, his lust for relentless and barbarous persecution – these things have put an almost unbearable burden up on the exchange of ideas in the United States”
*Should say of course that the majority of those who partake in thanksgiving do so without any historical context, it’s just purely to give thanks (which as a concept is lovely, as are Americans who mark it).