crumblequeen - the Royal College of Obstetrics says that:
- Future deliveries
What advice should women be given following an obstetric anal sphincter injury concering future pregnancies and mode of delivery?
1)All women who sustained an obstetric anal sphincter injury in a previous pregnancy should be counselled about the risk of developing anal incontinence or worsening symptoms with subsequent vaginal delivery.
2)All women who sustained an obstetric anal sphincter injury in a previous pregnancy should be advised that there is no evidence to support the role of prophylactic episiotomy in subsequent pregnancies.
3)All women who have sustained an obstetric anal sphincter injury in a previous pregnancy and who are symptomatic or have abnormal endoanal ultrasonography and/or manometry should have the option of
elective caesarean birth.
Guidelines here
This is advice for those who had 3rd or 4th degree tears with previous births - which I am presuming you had given the forceps and bowel issues, or at least your damage (if caused by an extremely long second stage compressing nerves etc) is very similar.
I think you are very wise to hit this head on straightaway in your pregnancy. If your consultant seems not to listen to you then request to be moved to another consultant.
I think finding out why your (relatively small) baby didn't come out when you were fully dilated is vital. In my case I had a long second stage because DD was Occipito Transverse - her head was engaged side on and there was no way she could descend the birth canal. A midwife error left me being told to push her out for hours which did a lot of damage to my bladder and resulted in DD's emergency forceps arrival in theatre as her heartrate crashed.
I have been told there is no reason why this baby should get stuck OT again, no reason why I would need forceps again, no reason why I would tear badly again - but for me there is also no reason why those things wouldn't happen again! I was very active and prepared lots for my first birth, did all the positioning stuff advised, but to no avail. So while I know they aren't interested in looking into my pelvis shape I am personally taking my history into account and don't want to risk another stuck baby with potentially great damage to the baby and me.
I know my consultant told me that at times it is safer for the baby to use forceps than a c-section. In my case because I had been dilated for hours and she was past the spines of the pelvis and wedged there. A cs would've had to pull her up again to get her out which would apparantly be more risky than rotating and down. I was prepped for an emcs in case the forceps failed. So I felt that I also wanted forceps nowhere near me ever again, but that a situation could arise where they were the baby's best chance and I would need to agree to get them safely out.
An elcs would also save your pelvic floor from another huge stretch as the baby's head (and forceps!) come through it. My physio told me that would lean her towards an elcs for me as I have ongoing bladder incontinence and could do with retaining the strength I have left there. Might depend on the reason for the bowel issues but perhaps worth considering as I believe the pelvic floor muscles help with controlling bowel movements as well as bladder(?).