Regarding the "I pay taxes" niggle that some posters have.
Ema76 was presumably exasperated by and defending her corner against this post by nervousal at 12.06 on 13/8/08
"And I disagree that "ultimately i should choose how i give birth when fully informed of the risks and benefits". If you have an elective c sec on NHS then its my taxes that are paying for it. If you go private to have one and (god forbid) there should be any complications it will be my taxes that pay to put it right."
Expat
22.38 13/8/08
"Well, emma, if you read the rest of the thread, you'll see the OP wants a csection because then there'll be no damage to her vagina or anus because she doesn't fancy sitting with legs akimbo being stitched and once you have a vaginal birth you're 'never the same'".
These are points gamely debated/acknowledged by Ema76 with yourself and others waaaayyy after her initial post and intital reasons were outlined.
To summarise these minor subsidiary reasons and wilfully mispresent them them to another MNer as Ema76's only reason for wanting to avoid the vaginal birth process is SHAMEFUL and done to elicit condemnation of her preference for an elective c-section.
Lets not bother with the original post anymore shall we, lets just have expat's interpretation of it. I think not, it is clearly about as reliable as midwives facts and statistics reeled off in trying to deter women wanting homebirths or c-sections.
You undermine your own MN poster credibility and IMO you owe Ema76 an apology.