I have to say that, I disagree with the idea of self diagnosis being a bad thing on this particular subject. I really think it has a key role to play with this particular condition because of some of the common patterns of behaviour associated with it. Certainly awareness of what an illness is and how it affects you is really important for a range of series conditions as it saves lives. I see this in a similar way.
In terms of "self diagnosis", being able to put a name to how I've been feeling has been the biggest step forward I could have made. Without that moment of realisation, I don't think that I would even be in a position of even considering the possibility of having children, and I would still be going around with the ultra defensive "I hate children" line. I think its a 'lightbulb' moment thing.
And thats the thing, with primary tokophobia, as women carry it around for a long time not being able to understand whats going on. Certainly in primary tocophobia it often starts as a child, and women are well aware that they harbour 'unnatural' thoughts about childbirth and feel unable to discuss it because its so taboo or affects their self worth as a woman.
Being able to "self diagnose" in this situation, opens the door for help. Even if the self diagnosis isn't completely right, I think empowers and helps people at least seek out support and information that they wouldn't have otherwise. You are talking about a condition where women can go to pretty extreme lengths to avoid becoming pregnant or terminate pregnancies that they want, as they are just unable to talk about the subject at all.
Suddenly you aren't a freak and suddenly you can express things in a way you couldn't before as it has a name and so has to be taken seriously rather than just being "hysterical and weak". Being able to say "I have a problem here, but I'm not unusual as its recognised" and then be able to rationalise it from that point, has certainly helped me enormously.
In recent months, I've been able to talk to close friends about it, and for DH to be able to explain to my SIL that, I'm not being rude in wanting to avoid her because she's pregnant/just had a baby, its actually cos I have a certain issue that I need to work through. In doing that I've got support and feel more able to deal with perhaps taking things another step forward.
The power balance between doctors and patients is often a really a huge part of tokophobia. Trust between the two is a very, very regular theme - and that means that, actually, counselling therefore can become deeply problematic. How can you talk to some one about your deepest and darkest, when actually they represent a large part of that fear in the first place? Imagine being afraid of doctors or completely distrusting of doctors in one way or another, but someone says "Oh well the only way you can solve this is to talk to a doctor"... I really do think this is an important piece of the puzzle that people miss. Its why offering assess to counselling is good, but to say, "I don't get why anyone wouldn't want it" rather misses a huge part of the issue.
When you start talking to women on here requesting an ELCS it very quickly becomes apparent, just how much homework some of them have done into the VB and ELCS debate. Many (like me) are obsessive about it.
At the heart of that is this huge mistrust of HCPs, how risk is presented and discussed, issues of consent not being properly respected or done by coercion. Many are shocked and feel lied to when presented with risks of VBs - women feel there is a lack of transparency. Ignorance of the subject of tocophobia or even a complete denial of the existence by some HCPs doesn't help. Which unfortunately is compounded by the promotion of the 'too posh to push' myth by the press (and the governments failure to follow up recommendations from 2003 to study why women make maternal requests in this country and to standardise how reasons for ELCS are recorded, so the subject can actually be studied properly. Instead we are left with Sweden, Norway and Finland leading the way and leaving us lagging behind).
And to pick up on something fruity said earlier - If you start reading a lot of the threads on this subject, I do think it is very easy to very quickly, be able to pick out individuals to whom the idea of a VB with support is more palatable and to whom the suggestion is liable to provoke a reaction of outright distress in. Its difficult to explain, but there does seem to be very clear patterns in the way people phrase things and the emphasis and importance they put on certain things.
From that point of view I do think that just letting women have an ELCS if they are that set on it, has to be done and even approaching the subject of counselling needs to be done VERY sensitively, and at arms length and with extreme caution.
I do think that if that is respected, it starts to rebuild bridges over trust, and make the woman more likely to seek help over surrounding issues surrounding that at her own pace and on her own terms. When someone is pregnant isn't necessarily the time to do it by any means, and I find it odd to even suggest exploring a lot of issues at that time. The ELCS might not be the ideal solution, but it definitely has a lot of merit in re-establishing faith in HCPs.
On a personal level, I find thunksheadontable's lack of understanding why wouldn't someone 'just try' counselling, slightly difficult to cope with. I have to say, I'm just left with the words "you don't understand how I feel" floating around my brain.
If HCP and politicians aren't doing their job in identifying and promoting awareness of tocophobia and ending the "too push too push" myth, then as the situation stands "self diagnosis" is actually the only way to actually gain access to care for many. Even Ariel's admission on this thread that she wasn't even aware that there was such a thing as a perinatal mental health team points to that.