hunkermunker
I can't speak for L but you didn't get what I was saying
L said "I don't think bf or not bf, extended bf or not makes a big difference to a child, we have plenty of emotionally balanced, healthy people in the world that were both extended bf and same for those bottlefed so the choice is with parent and child."
I disagreed with the initial bf bit, I think it is important healthwise (if possible) to breastfeed to 6 months. But the extended bf, ie the past 6 months no, I do not think it does make that big a difference in terms of health or development to a baby.
Personally no I didn't wean my children off the breast at 6 months, I waited until they were old enough to take cow's milk and manage a beaker, each one of mine was weaned before a year though, anywhere after 9 months to be honest. I dislike the concept of breastfeeding toddlers, children who can talk, walk, hoik up your top are old enough to be handed a cup of cow's milk and cuddled for comfort. And I think it is 'bitty' when 3 and 4 year olds breastfeed in all senses of the word, particularly in public. But then I also think there's something wrong with people who refer to 2 year olds as 'he's 24 months old' (different topic, but evokes same sense of let them develop to me)
If we need disclaimers then I don't really care what other people choose to do, formula or not, extended breastfeeding or not. everyone has the right to take care of their children the way they best see fit.
but there always seem to be a lot of militant extended breastfeeders on this site, which does not actually reflect society, and I for one will not be cowed into silence by the shouting down that will no doubt come after this post