Mrsbadger, I've read research on it before slightly more up to date too, that research is 23 yrs and 13yrs old. Going on that if you read what I said, I am still correct. There is an increase and reduction,not a statistically significant one - which is what I said- "most would not notice it..."
Using only 10 mother and infant pairs, is not conclusive research by any means. nor is it good research. It proves very little. Nor does research using 26 women. you need a much much larger number of women as a control group, as well as the 'research' group. A peer review would be daft, on such a small research group. It does, of course show that there is a really valid reason for further research in this subject. maybe I should do it!
realise a lot of what i've written may come across as arsey possible, totally not intended. Just wanted to reply, and being distracted by DD (14 months) , who is as i type trying to get to the chocolate tin my fault entirely. See, I produce chocolate milk.
God, I wish I hadn't got into this thread, i'm too tired for it.