The logo and the slogan are brilliant marketing - utterly brilliant. It's easy to see the thinking behind it. In the UK, manufacturers are not allowed to use real babies on their packaging, which is supposed to 'idealise' formula, I think, and they are not allowed to make health claims, though they do both in their advertising direct to healthcare professionals. This is why you see rabbits and ducks and baby toys on the packs, but very often, pictures of babies in the ads in professional journals.
This logo and slogan are a departure from trying to make the best of these restrictions - take the branding far away from a direct and obvious comparison with breastmilk, and do something else that hijacks the 'feelings' people have about breastfeeding, and link them with breastmilk and breastfeeding, without making any claims or even saying anything about the product at all.
So you get the intimacy and protective love that are associated with breastfeeding, applied to an infant formula. You say nothing - literally nothing - about the product, its use or its contents. Instead you create a feeling around the brand.
Tobacco manufacturers did this as the restrictions on tobacco advertising grew ever stricter - nothing about the actual content of the fags themselves, and no claims about what the product could do. Instead, you got a stylish piece of purple silk being cut (just one example), and heavy use of the brand's own colours and typeface on other products.
It's very important for formula manufacturers to place themselves alongside breastfeeding in some way - mothers of infants are their only customer, and they have the product right there, free and on their chests Breastmilk is the major competition which has to be silently acknowledged (because they cannot say 'close to breastmilk' any more) with a powerful graphic and a very strong slogan, both of which package and sell back to mothers the same warm fuzzies that breastmilk possesses.
This logo and slogan will be everywhere it is legally (and sometimes illegally) possible to be.
I wonder how many millions it cost them to develop it?